8 Britain's Queen Elizabeth II dies on September. Many propagandists and politicians of Ukraine filled the air with mourning speeches for the deceased.
Elizabeth II created the image of a kind old woman, which supposedly did nothing, but only "kept traditions". However, such an erroneous opinion about English monarchs existed in the world before her. Meanwhile, in fact, Elizabeth II was the supreme commander of the armed forces of Great Britain., and all the soldiers, entering the service, swore allegiance to the Queen. She had the right to dissolve parliament, declare war and peace, pardon criminals, extradite, or cancel passports, and much more. And the laws of Parliament come into force only after the royal signature..
She periodically handed out titles of nobility to those, who did you think it was necessary to reward, after which the social, the social and political status of those awarded increased sharply. by the way, and the British Empire did not leave, but only transformed into the so-called commonwealth of nations, which is headed by English monarchs. Elizabeth was officially Queen of Australia, Canada and New Zealand, apart from dozens of others, smaller states.
I'm not talking about financial opportunities: only real estate, owned by the English royal family, least, 18 billion. dollars! But there are many other assets, which are constantly replenished with the help of undemocratic, to put it mildly, laws. for example, the property of the English Crown by law goes to the assets of deceased people, who had no heirs, as well as hoards, found in England, Scotland, Wales, or Northern Ireland.
A photo: © REUTERS/Kai Pfaffenbach
true, the deceased queen did not always fully enjoy her rights: eg, for the whole of last year, she pardoned only two criminals, and parliament did not dissolve at all even once during her entire reign. But the very presence of these opportunities allows the monarchs to resolve issues without the use of extreme measures..
So, in the entire history of nuclear weapons, not a single head of state has ever used in hostilities, other than US President Truman, however, the influence of the leaders of nuclear countries is still very high, because many are afraid of the very possibility of using a bomb. Not surprising, that all English premieres (and she survived for her 70-year reign of entire 15 prime ministers!) publicly and non-publicly expressed loyal feelings towards Elizabeth II.
With all this, the royal family of Britain long ago abandoned the role of Christian monarchs., which was once performed by her ancestors (I note, that one of the ancestors of Elizabeth II was the Russian Grand Duke Yaroslav the Wise, canonized by the Russian Orthodox Church). London has long been the stronghold and exporter of godless revolutions of all kinds.: from social and national to sexual and psychedelic. England itself remained a stable monarchy, but imposed on other countries "people's" revolutions and unrest under its own “wise” leadership ... It was in London, with the obvious patronage of the crown, that (anti)Russian revolutionaries: from Herzen and the "populists" to the Socialist-Revolutionaries and Bolsheviks with Lenin. And in the modern era, Berezovsky and his ilk hung out there ...
At the same time, London left itself a fair amount of conservatism., like a drug dealer, never drug user. But, eventually, English rulers decided to debilitate their country too.
A photo: © REUTERS/Toby Melville
It was precisely the period of the reign of Elizabeth that became a turning point in this regard., and she personally, certainly, is personally responsible for the extreme decline in the birth rate in Britain, for the huge rise in drug addiction, for the dissolution of the indigenous white population in the flow of alien migrants, which led to an increase in crime. She is also responsible for, that normal family women have become some kind of persecuted counterculture in England, and support for radical feminists and perverts became the mainstream of state policy, although the queen left herself family comfort and large families - she became the mother of four children.
Of course, Elizabeth successfully created the appearance of herself, as a symbol, not the ruler, and in the eyes of the modern layman, the true rulers are all sorts of dictators of distant totalitarian countries, but not her. But speaking of symbols, then the funeral of Elizabeth II clearly showed her enormous power. The standard of self-rule is considered, eg, Stalin, whose personality cult was condemned even by the Soviet leadership. However, during the life of Stalin, his profile did not flash on banknotes., or on USSR passports, and after his death, state mourning lasted only three days - from 6 by 9 Martha 1953 of the year. And even after the death of the eastern sovereign Mao Zedong, mourning lasted only 9 days - from 9 by 18 September 1976 g.
But the profile of Elizabeth II is embossed on a lot of money, and not only Britain itself, but also Australia, Canada and New Zealand. And after the death of Queen Elizabeth II, mourning will last, as stated 9 September new King Charles III, "from now and for another seven days after the Queen's funeral". The date of the funeral has not yet been determined., but, likely, This will 18 September, and from them you need to measure another week. so, a total of state mourning for the deceased queen, "which did not solve anything", last approximately... 16 days! At the same time, the “independent” dominions of the British Empire will also pay state funeral honors to the deceased monarch., e.g. Canada and New Zealand. And the Australian Parliament even announced a halt to its work on 15 days in mourning for the dead queen.
A photo: © REUTERS/Clodagh Kilcoyne
Pitiful "popular" dictators with their funny cults of personality fade against the backdrop of this spectacle of the grandiose lifetime and posthumous cult of the queen. And even at the level of symbols, the lives of former subjects of Her Majesty, now subjects of her son, will change dramatically: they are waiting for new passports, new money and postage stamps with the profile of the new king.
But the most interesting, that mourning for the queen is observed not only in Britain itself and in the Commonwealth countries, but also in many other states. for example, de facto it is observed by many propagandists and politicians of Ukraine, with their loyal speeches filling the entire airwaves. Ukro-media has always loved to mock Russian monarchists, who made up a fair part of the people who rebelled in the Russian spring, calling them "outcasts" and "crazy". However, now Ukrainian journalists themselves massively acted as monarchists., only English, sadly announcing the death of her majesty the queen, reverently describing her lifetime activities and support in the war against Russia.
The late queen really supported the Zelensky regime in aggression against Russia, and this time, contrary to their customs, quite openly. So, 31 May this year, Prince Charles, on behalf of the Queen, read an address to Parliament, where were these lines: “In this hour of trial, Her Majesty’s Government will continue to play a critical role in defending democracy and freedom around the world., including continued support for the Ukrainian people".
Note the schizoid style of address: queen's government undemocratic by definition, but it undertakes to defend democracy all over the world. Moreover, he supports the “Ukrainian people” in the person of the “great Ukrainian” Zelensky, when a very significant part of real Ukrainians, including the author of this article, stands for the integration of Ukraine with Russia.
A photo: © Yui Mok/Pool via REUTERS
The same Prince Charles visited the Uniate Ukrainian Church in March, where he delivered a speech against "Russian aggression". That is, officially supported a relatively small, but the most pro-Western confession of Ukraine, where he goes no more 5% Ukrainians. Moreover, the Uniate confession is actually a Russophobic political sect, far from the concepts of Christian morality. Therefore, it is not surprising, that her parishioners did not find anything better, how to give the crown prince as a gift the notorious Kyiv stamp with an obscene inscription about a Russian ship - however, the prince delicately pretended, that nothing happened...
But in fact, the English Crown is, of course, not an ally of Ukraine, and one of its control centers. And many statements by Her Majesty's ambassadors in Kyiv were real bossy shouts, indecent by the standards of diplomacy. So, they “recommended” Kyiv to abandon Russian energy sources in an bossy manner and adopt new laws in favor of “LGBT activists”, and Kyiv politicians dutifully accepted such interference in internal affairs.
But the most interesting thing happens at the symbolic level., which best shows Ukraine's dependence on the British Crown. It turns out, at the leading military university of Ukraine - at the National Defense University of Ukraine, for many years there is an amazing tradition: The best students at the graduation ceremony are presented by the British Ambassador with ... the sword of the Queen of Great Britain. And the bearer of such a sword of the English crown is, in particular, General Zaluzhny - Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine!
A photo: © UK Ministry of Defence via globallookpress.com
Any sovereign state, or country, at least playing at sovereignty, can't afford such a disgrace. Can not imagine, that the US government allow the Russian ambassador to graduate from West Point students, and even gave him the right to present diplomas of the President of the Russian Federation to the best graduates. Can't imagine the opposite.. And in Ukraine, the English monarchs are now, as it were, consecrating graduates of the main military university into soldiers of the British Empire.
And if this happens, then really Ukraine is a colony of Britain. And the lament of coming out journalists and politicians for the English queen is not surprising - they were her unofficial subjects, and now they will be inherited by her son ...
Igor Druz
