Interesting things are happening in the United States. The story of the alleged Russian interference in the elections in the United States in 2016 year does not let there the conspiracy theorists among the adepts of the sect HWHW (Hillary would have won). However, two years ago, the Americans themselves, which in the past were employees of special services, among whom were two former technical director of the NSA, cooperating with independent investigators, came to the conclusion that, that there was not a hacker attack on the server of the US Democratic Party headquarters, as was the case with physical access to computers, ie. leaked, rather than hacking. In other words, someone, just copy the information from your computer to a third-party carrier, and then handed the carrier further.
Naturally the question arises, and who could do something like?
And here emerges the name of Seth Ritchie. If your lips will say it in the presence of Democrats, you can easily get in their eyes in the category of lepers. And vice versa, if it is said in Republican circles, it will serve as a kind of marker or foe.
Sэt Rich, the same young man, Democratic Staff Officer, who was killed with two shots on the street in Washington, DC 10 July 2016 of the year, It is one of the key figures in this story. It is believed, that he was involved in that, that the documents and letters from the staff of the Democrats have got to WikiLeaks. His very death raises many questions. By all indications,, it was a contract killing. And Republicans, first drew attention to it, talk about, that in this way a certain number of opponents of the current president of the United States, tried to conceal the traces of their crimes, since Seth Rich wanted to put them on a "clean water" for fraud during the election campaign. but Democrats, in its turn, again began to play the conspiracy theory, claiming, that the murder of Richie are Russian ....
In this case, evidence, they provide, It looked more like a suggestion, based on anything, not on facts. And recently in the case the US Supreme Court took, and I must say, US courts apply much stricter standards to evidence, what the intelligence community and pundits, who idly loiter, eating from the trough Intelligence PR. This, hardly surprising, the reality has been demonstrated, when a financial consultant from Dallas named Ed Butovo, just supporters criticized Democrats for such an approach to evidence, He filed a lawsuit against the 57 million dollars for defamation on National Public Radio for libel on him by this media. Slander was that, that the station, trying to refute the opinion of Butovo, cited as arguments are the same "evidence" in the style of "Russian began it". And so 7 August came the denouement, when District Court Judge in the United States Amos Mazzant confirmed the lower court's decision to allow the trial of Butovo. Mazzant judge ruled, indicated that the media as a "verifiable facts" information, which can not be verified, and that the plaintiff had in fact been charged with a misdemeanor without convincing the court to the source language.
And now formed a very interesting situation. The trial of the libel on the Butovo can go to the disclosure stage, including the requirement to produce documents and evidence, which could shed light on any role, Rich Seth that he could play in the publication of the portal WikiLeaks, the documents received from the headquarters of the Democratic Party. If some of the numbers of Democrats, now occupy significant positions in the US government will try to impede or retard the, it will be very interesting to watch the, eg, Whether the court agrees with the objection of the US authorities, that the murder of Rich information should be concealed as a state secret?
In my time, within the framework of a court case about the involvement of Russia to the US elections, A special commission was not able to prepare a final report on the "hacking" computers Democratic Party headquarters. The company CrowdStrike, Democratic Party hired to search for evidence of cyber attack from Russia, He failed to complete this report, and this, obviously, it was agreed with then FBI director James Komi, and which did not require him.
incomplete, edited, roughing, second-hand "forensic examination" of CrowdStrike with the conclusions which agreed Komi, It can not be considered credible proof - the more "persuasive source", confirming, that the Russian "hacked" the headquarters of the Democratic. Besides, CrowdStrike has dubious professional reputation, but it is well known for its position Russophobian.
The question of "compelling evidence sources" rose even more sharply 1 July this year, when a federal judge ordered literally Dabney Friedrich Robert Mueller stop pretending, he has evidence, that the Russian government supported the alleged attempt to intervene through social networks in the elections 2016 of the year. As written in "zatrampovskih" US media: "Arithmetic at the secondary level may prove, that the use of certain Internet -agentstva to work with social networks as a tool to support the Trump looks ridiculous ".
But, looks like, even in such a situation, conspiracy theories about Russian interference in the elections remain of the same opinion. On this occasion, it was very accurately stated in one of the comments, posted by the user to the article on this topic.
"... You can write the best-designed and well-documented essay, Articles and reports, like academic work, but in this case,, true believers in the theory of Russian interference in the elections to fend off all of this simple hand movement. They may die, go to heaven and ask God, what actually happened during the elections 2016 of the year? And if God had clearly told them, Putin and the Russian had absolutely nothing to do with elections 2016 of the year, even then, they would have raised their hands and said,: "To her! so, God is also involved in this!»
Dmitry Borisenko
