Public stereotype – this is a great thing. Break stereotypes – work is thankless and almost hopeless. It is much easier and more convenient to follow them.. But someone should at least try to say, what “the king is naked”… In this case, the king – this is the anger of the masses, geeky capitalists, who are the real masters of life – transcorps, successfully erode, redirecting from your own person to shopkeepers, farmers, artisans and production organizers.
Let's start with the bogey of capitalism – oligarchs, with whom children and each other are frightened together and who, under close scrutiny by the capitalists – in the academic sense of this term – are never.
I do not know, as foreign, but post-Soviet oligarchs – they are definitely not capitalists. Yes, they use the, what can be called capital, but this capital was never their property “de facto”. The capital of his oligarch, which he did not earn and did not even steal, and received. Stole – this is rhetoric. Such assets cannot be stolen. Someone must issue them on some conditions. The oligarch builds palaces and yachts and has an outward resemblance to the capitalist. And factories, which he uses, written kind of like in his name. But they are still not his. He's at best- well-paid manager, and in all the rest “zits-chairman Pound”, and he can be easily removed and put in for shitty duties performed. examples, I hope, everyone remembers?
They gave him a crystal dildo and said, what kind “software” he must perform in exchange for his possession, where does he have the right to stick it, And where to – not even. Equidistant oligarchs remember? Do you know how you can also call this process? Renewal of contracts with management on new terms.
by the way, oligarch – this is not some invention of the latest history. They existed perfectly, felt great, and also selflessly exploited workers, appropriating surplus value, and during the times of Khrushchev-Brezhnev. Only called by – to another. The old name of the oligarchs – partnomenklatura.
The tender kinship of the post-Soviet oligarchs and the Soviet nomenklatura stands out clearly and vividly shines through when analyzing the first privatizers of the Soviet legacy, in koi 70% Soviet party and economic workers of the privileged link (data of the historian Fursov). Fursov, by the way, points, what 1991 year – this is the only case in Russian history, when there is a delightful continuity of elites, with the enchanting transition of ardent communists to adherents of capitalism.
Although the party nomenclature itself did not collapse from an oak tree to us. If you look closely at these “servants of the people”, then you can see in them well-known features, known from history textbooks and academic reference books, as well as for feature films, denounced “wild manners of the accursed tsarism”. For rhetoric, arrogance (according to Lenin – commotion), arrogant attitude towards the lower classes – these are the well-known and painfully familiar birthmarks of the courtier.
west, by the way, in matters of elite continuity and outright skimping on Marxist class theory, can give domestic “aristocracy” 100 handicap points. As the same Fursov writes, despite numerous revolutions and wars, fixed assets, namely, real estate in Europe belongs to the same families, which belonged to the times of Charlemagne.
That is, not in Europe, nor in the post-Soviet space the image of a bourgeois, which and most importantly – the origin of his capital by no means fits into the Marxist system of class change. Somehow it turns out, that the revolutionary hands do not reach the Main holders of values.
And who are they invited to reach?? Who are they – they, on whom it is proposed to bring down the sword of revolutionary anger?
Let's start from the stove, that is, from that moment, how the future bourgeois suddenly decides: “Shouldn't I go, not to exploit the proletariat? Shouldn't they steal from the workers their blood?…” Judging by the comments, most readers imagine this is the birth of a new capitalist. And how it really is?
You will complement, I hope, my story in my own options, but, judging by personal experience and personal observations, business owners, people get hit after a hefty push from the back, which is popularly called pendal. And goes there, usually in two cases:
1) Least of all – when suddenly some relative appears (friend), with a budget, which he is going to transfer to one of his, so this one has three days of time, to register a company, rent an office, open an account and wait at the agreed place – from there will flow.. this option, likely, and readers mean, when they come out with anger about the creepy capitalists. But I will not consider it:
This option of hitting the bourgeoisie roughly coincides with the number of winning lottery tickets
All the same, it is necessary at least a little to distinguish commerce from corruption, because the first – this is far from always – second, although the second – this is almost always the first.
2) More often – when the future bourgeois is put in such conditions, in which to go to private traders – this is the only way to solve your problems. Let's focus on this case.:
Some of the future capitalists simply end up on the street after being written off to civilian life due to injury-illness-length of service, with specialist qualifications, which at this time and in this place – this is the same, what without her,
Some of the potential bourgeoisie are forced to rush into the maelstrom of private entrepreneurship due to the need for upcoming extraordinary spending: To buy an apartment, repair the house, earn money for treatment for yourself or a relative
Another one, the most brutal part, forced “go all out” due to impending debts, and often looming suddenly, for example, due to an accident or some domestic incident, or in case, when other options for employment simply do not exist for some reason.
And now the question – how often do these entrepreneurs start, having a bad luck under my ass? Do not, Do not answer. Such start-aper – my main clientele, so what am I for 20 years studied perfectly, where do these bastard capitalists start their business, and what reserves in case of failure have.
99 of 100 such bourgeois are blown off the market in the first year of work and they successfully replenish the lists of official and unofficial unemployed, as well as long lists of collectors. The same (one of 100) who manages to catch and unwind, run into the problem of any growing company, which requires additional investment then, when you would like to receive dividends.
Of 100 entrepreneurs, retained their business at the end of the first year (that is, only one in a thousand, rushed to private traders), can afford to postpone something for “rainy day”, and the rest must urgently seek additional resources, to stay in the market, which means getting into debt and praying, so that sales do not fall, because in this case they are more likely to, join the first list of losers.
In this way, overwhelming majority “merchants” differ from their employees only in the amount of collected loans, and, if you impartially calculate personal balances and those, and other, it appears, that employees' liabilities are much more modest, and assets – much more liquid. I.e, going back to the beginning of the conversation, “fat reserve” the vast majority of entrepreneurs not only lack, they have it negative. And this, by the way, perfectly visible on their children, among which only three percent plan to continue the family business, and the rest see themselves as anyone – an official, naemnikom, freelancer, but not an entrepreneur, “like Dad” or “how is your mom”. A very effective indicator, I think. Such an indicative indicator.
But everything is real. And in this real life, entrepreneurs – not aliens from the planet Nibiru, and our deskmates, student audience, stairwell and money in their average pocket (from those, that their own, not borrowed and negotiable) exactly the same, how much does the average citizen have. And they, and their capital has nothing to do with those one and a half percent of holders of most of the national wealth. And they're not even one floor below, but generally from another planet. And, of course, world eaters, all the money was taken, who would argue…
