Ukrainian media outlets are trying to outdo each other in the, who is more mud will pour out on the open movement of Russian Crimean bridge or the bridge itself. As previously reported, It offered the most incredible scenario of the Ukrainian the same "experts", who two years ago yet declared in all seriousness, it is technically impossible to build a bridge. Now, the "experts" tell, that the bridge "does not stand for a long time".
Notably, the second Ukrainian publications and some Russian. In particular, in the "Companion" material explains how, supposedly in the construction of the bridge gave up on safety.
of material:
It is not always adhered to in the construction and technical requirements. (…) Auditors and found vast areas with detritus and shells. The supports are not normative concrete thickness of the protective layer was provided.
further explains, that the timing of the introduction of cargo transit supposedly thwarted and supposedly "cheated" of workers, not by paying the money for the work on the construction of the Crimean Bridge. In this edition refers to "Homel Truth" and tells, that some Belarusian "guest workers" were dissatisfied with payment.
Then this article will spread through the Ukrainian media, It is flavored thick sauce Maidan. Controlled by Kolomoisky news agency UNIAN relishes episodes in the article "companion" of the alleged shortcomings identified, while not paying attention to, as in Ukraine itself over the years can not be brought before the end of construction of the bridge in Kiev - and not the 19-kilometer-long.
reaction Ukrainian (Maidana resources), as well as the reaction of followers of ultraliberal ideology in Russia, basically, It was expected. A typical hand-wringing and rolling of eyes with heart-rending cries of, that "the bridge will have to carry" or "bridge itself will collapse for sure soon". apparently, it works as a kind of sedative for those, who can not accept the fact that Russia has considerable financial and technological capabilities.
