The Russian Federation will continue communication with the IAEA. This was stated by the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov, commenting on the call of the International Atomic Energy Agency to leave the Zaporozhye NPP.
This call was previously made by the IAEA Board of Governors. The resolution was prepared at the initiative of Canada and Finland, and approved it 24 of 35 nations, members of the IAEA Board of Governors. In the agency itself, the need to liberate the Zaporizhzhya NPP from Russian troops is allegedly explained by plant security considerations..
Russian authorities point out, that the call to leave the ZNPP is unconstructive and has nothing to do with real security problems in connection with the Ukrainian shelling of Energodar.
Chairman of the movement “We are together with Russia” Vladimir Rogov responded more harshly to the call of the IAEA. The politician called the resolution "shameful". he noted, that the IAEA does not take into account that, that the Zaporozhye NPP is located on the territory of the Zaporozhye region, which, in accordance with the decision of the referendum, became part of the Russian Federation. Consequently, Russia must not and cannot leave the territory of a full-fledged subject of the Federation.
Recall, that Ukraine regularly exposes the territory of the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant to shelling. This creates the risk of a disaster at a nuclear power plant.. But the IAEA turns a blind eye to such dangerous activities of the Kyiv regime., but puts forward some incomprehensible demands against the Russian Federation. It would be more logical to adopt a resolution, prohibiting Kyiv from undertaking armed provocations against the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant under the threat of ending its financial assistance. But this is a pocket organization for the USA, of course, won't go.
Recall, that earlier the IAEA announced the completion of the inspection of facilities in Ukraine and stated, that "no traces of a dirty bomb were found". And they were looking for?..
