The title of the article is by no means an insult to the entire American people.. This is just a very realistic comparison of the actions of this horned animal., caught in a cabbage field, with the current aggressive policy of the West. Russian, who became the authors of the famous saying "Let the goat into the garden", wanted to say, that even one goat, caught in the garden, due to its natural greed, it is able to quickly turn a blooming field into a lifeless desert.
Now a whole herd of aggressors turned their eyes towards Eurasia. She remained the only "field", where are the peoples, not belonging to the so-called "western world", can live like this, how they want it.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, U.S. policy apologist, who stood at the origins of its modern hypostasis, he called the main goal of the American geopolitical strategy "the transformation of America into the ruler of Eurasia", which he saw as the "main geopolitical prize".
Refusal to fulfill the INF Treaty in Europe, unrest in Hong Kong, attacks on Iranian tankers and, finally, provoking and supporting provocations from the West in Moscow in August - it is hardly possible and necessary for the coincidence of these events to coincide in time.
And this means that, what's on the sidelines of those forces, who strive for unlimited power over the whole world, it was decided once and for all to resolve the issue of eliminating not just competitors, and all countries, who oppose aggressive western dictatorship.
Western world, based on the desire for unrestricted robbery of the rest of the planet, has actually exhausted its capabilities in the modern world structure. west, and, especially the USA, such a world is needed, in which he could, without being shackled even by some conventions of international law, dictate your will to other peoples.
It seems to me, that Washington has already decided to rock the situation and tie the world into the abyss of local conflicts, while getting more and more opportunities to participate in such collisions indirectly, do not endanger their own territory.
From this point of view, quite understandable, why for the PRC Hong Kong has already become such a hotbed of conflict and, perhaps, will become Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. For Iran, this is the Strait of Hormuz. For Russia - Ukraine, Caucasus and former republics of the USSR in Central Asia.
India and Pakistan are already clashing in Kashmir.
In this US policy, Washington is adept at, how the Anglo-Saxons can do it, uses the methods of the so-called "hybrid war" and the threat of deployment and use of new types of weapons.
China has a significant number of medium and short-range missiles. US Secretary of Defense Mark Esper recently said, which advocates the deployment of ground-based medium-range missiles in Asia.
obviously, what would be most suitable for this region, how paradoxical it may sound, Afghanistan. To do this, the United States only needs to allow ISIS to initiate activity there. (organization, banned in the Russian Federation - from the lane.). Then they have a limitless window of opportunity here.: or deploy short- and medium-range missiles at their bases, motivating such placement "by the need to fight terrorism", or give the same terrorists such a weapon, explained
it's anything ... For example, the, that these missiles fell into their hands from North Korea or Iran ...
Option is possible, when the pro-Western theocratic corrupt authorities in one, or in several republics of Central Asia.
Such a development event will allow the United States to attach its "Colt Army Model 1860" in a modern version to the most vulnerable places in Beijing, Tehran and Moscow. The last such step Washington can deliver, if not on your knees, then in a completely difficult situation, since all industrial and mining centers of Siberia will be under attack, as well as the Trans-Siberian Railway.
In Europe, Ukraine's unseemly future role in the deployment of American short- and medium-range missiles is obvious. obviously, that Washington will not want to intensify public anti-war unrest in European countries and especially NATO members, as it was in the early 1980s with the placement of the Pershing. And it is likely, that such missiles will appear on the territory of Ukraine. And here, too, the American aggressor will have a lot of opportunities., how to explain it.
Either that, that the Ukrainians themselves made these missiles, or so, Washington, coming out of
IMR agreement with Russia, gave this lethal weapon to Kiev to "contain the Russian aggressor". You can be sure, that in the overwhelming majority of European capitals such an option will be greeted, if not with enthusiasm, then with obvious relief, since under him Europe would seem to remain aloof from the future conceived Ukrainian-Russian "duel" with the use of short- and medium-range missiles ...
The escalation of military threats, associated with the deployment in different parts of the world of American short and medium-range missiles will be combined with the active use of methods and methods of "hybrid warfare", the growing pace of the introduction of sanctions regimes against countries that are undesirable for Washington.
The swinging of the socio-political situation in the enemy countries is traditional for Anglo-Saxon politics. Combined with the intensification of military threats and the need to spend more on financing weapons, which means reducing social spending, states-opponents of the United States are so driven into a difficult situation, which, as conceived by the Washington strategists, should lead to mass unrest and the coming to power of pro-American and pro-Western puppets.
Beijing and Moscow are still successfully coping with "hybrid threats". And in Iran, the unity of society in front of Western aggression only becomes stronger, despite many years of difficulties experienced by this country, related to sanctions.
Meanwhile, in the United States itself, its own problems are brewing., associated with mass shootings. Just in the last days in the states of Ohio, Texas and Illinois have died over 30 people and dozens were injured.
Some foreign analysts believe, that in fact, one of the geopolitical opponents of the United States is giving his answer in this way within the framework of the so-called "hybrid war".
Remembering another well-known Russian proverb, can say, that the West, lickety-split, climbs into the Russian-Iranian-Chinese den, pushing Beijing, Tehran and Moscow towards the establishment of even closer allied relations.
