President of Russia during the St. Petersburg Economic Forum was asked to comment on the factual allegations made by the Prosecutor's Office of the Netherlands on the occasion of, that the Malaysian "Boeing" was hit by a SAM "Buk", allegedly belonging to the Kursk team defense. Recall, that the Dutch public prosecutor Vesterbeke said yesterday about the alleged transfer of "Buckow" from the Kursk region in the Ukrainian territory in June 2014 of the year. Today, several countries, including the Netherlands and Australia, We have directly accused the Russian Federation of responsibility for downed 17 July 2014 year airliner.
Vladimir Putin asked, I could rocket, who shot down the plane, belong to the Russian Armed Forces.
Russian President said, it is allegations. RIA Novosti is a statement the head of state:
No, of course. Again there are several versions, including, and version, it's rocket Ukrainian army, and aircraft, and so on. There is nothing, whatever gives us confidence in the quality of the final conclusions.
Next, Vladimir Putin once again stressed, Russia can not accept the conclusions of the Netherlands Commission for the simple reason, that Russian experts for some reasons was not allowed to investigate. Russian President actually repeated the thesis, expressed earlier Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, over whether, that if the investigation claims to impartiality and objectivity, it can not be done without experts from Russia.
experts note, what is now the West is trying to bring the situation to the usual option for themselves: shaft accusations without providing objective evidence, with preassigned guilty even without Russia's ability to defend itself in the international arena.
Vladimir Putin:
Objective investigation will not be without our full (in him) participation.
Meanwhile, Ukraine has still not responded to simple questions, Russia set back in July 2014 of the year: where dispatchers talks recording board MH17? Where do managers Dnepropetrovsk? Why are these managers at the last moment changed the route “Boeing”, sweep it over the epicenter of the fighting? Why Ukrainian SAM “beech”, standing near Zaroshchenske, returned to places of permanent deployment without missiles at one of the complexes?
