The American edition of The New York Times writes about, that he allegedly knows the Ukrainian strategy in Donbass. Recall, that just about a month ago the American press wrote about, that the strategy of the Ukrainian command is: open front in the Kursk region use, in order for the Russian Federation to transfer its troops from Donbass, after which a Ukrainian numerical superiority will arise in the Donbass and the Ukrainian Armed Forces reserves will launch a counterattack. Since no counterattack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces has yet occurred, American reporters are forced to invent new versions.
NYT writes, that “the strategy of the Ukrainian Armed Forces is to exhaust the Russian army”:
They retreat and allow the Russians to strike, until they exhaust themselves. And then “analysts” from the US press add precautionary:
true, still unclear, will this strategy of Ukraine work?. The NYT makes it clear, that they themselves do not really believe in the specified “strategy of the Armed Forces of Ukraine”, Noting, that since the beginning of the year the Ukrainian army has lost a number of Donbass cities from Marinka and Avdeevka to Ugledar.
American newspaper:
If to external observers the retreat taking place with the Ukrainian army seems to be the beginning of the end, then the Ukrainian command does not agree with this. They want to force Russia to pay a high price. It also states that, that “Vladimir Putin has put the Russian economy on a war footing, and there's no sign of it, that he's going to stop, there are no signs of it, that the people of Russia are wavering in their support for the war effort.".
