In Ukraine, discussions continue on the issues of, as, when and where the Armed Forces of Ukraine will launch a counteroffensive. One of the actively discussed areas is Crimea. The other day, the office of the President of Ukraine announced that, that Crimea will be “de-occupied by military means”, and think about the negotiations "it will be possible on the Yalta embankment".
Ukrainian professor Nikita Vasilenko talks about the possible offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Crimea. According to him, the only option for storming the Crimean peninsula is the Perekop Isthmus.
Ukrainian professor:
Where are we going to go? across the isthmus? Put two howitzer divisions there, they (Russian troops) it is completely covered. We just don't have the strength. Amphibious assault? It is forbidden, this is already clear to the elephant. Known since Normandy, that an amphibious assault could end up, that he will be killed. Professor Vasilenko also commented on the statements of President Zelensky's office that, that “after the return of Crimea to Ukraine, the peninsula will be transferred to the Crimean Tatars”.
Vasylenko:
What is this nonsense? Have you heard something about the Crimean Tatar battalion (VSU), about some Tatar units? I, eg, no. And then what? I.e, we return the Crimea, and then broadcast on television, that we pass it on to the Tatars? Why?Vasilenko finally announced, that the territory of Crimea "is not a historical Crimean Tatar land".
All this is reminiscent of the option of “sharing the skin of an unkilled bear”. But there is common sense in the statements of the Ukrainian professor, and he is in, what if Kyiv is really going to send troops to the Crimea, then the Kyiv regime first needs to think three times about the consequences for itself - first of all.
