And that oppose the transformation of the world order oligarchic?
Holding the next summit "Group of Twenty" (G20) Osaka revived the information field for the discussion of, what exactly is a "twenty", as well as other elite "group", in particular, "Group of Seven" (G7), which are often not quite rightly opposed to the UN.
First things first. The structure of the system of global governance in their work revealed a major ideology of globalism Jacques Attali, former head of the EBRD, Adviser to François Mitterrand and economic mentor, the current French president Emmanuel Makron. In the "new world order", which for the first time publicly and spoke to the establishment which called George HW Bush in a letter to the US Congress in 1990 year, F. Attali brought three components – "Myrovыe order" sacred, power and money.
For the "sacred order myrovoy" – notorious "new world religion", created on the basis of integration of different religious beliefs and religious systems, «Responsible» Vatican, which is still in 1962-1965 years of the Second Vatican Council has prepared for this ecumenical framework, recognizing Judaism "elder brother" of Christianity (Judeo-Christian concept). AT 1977 he appeared the fifth report of the Club of Rome Ervin Laszlo "Goals for mankind", which was put "a hierarchy of religions of the world" led by Judaism.
The next important step in the development of the ecumenical process was the adoption in 2001 , the Ecumenical Charter; it is - a large and separate topic. say only, that the history of ecumenism has its roots back in the middle of the XIX century, a single organizational form of ecumenical organization has received in 1948 year, when the World Council was established at the Amsterdam Congress of Churches (WCC), who in the eyes called "Protestant Vatican".
"The world order of power" – a euphemism political governance, a modern system which dates back to the first half of the 1970s, with the establishment of the Tripartite Commission. Brief background is. Even at the end of the XIX century, at the zenith of the power of the British Empire, began to arise the idea, to extend British imperial model for the whole world.
Strictly speaking, the first time such ideas have appeared much earlier, in the XVII century, against the backdrop of the Protestant Reformation in England, where they put forward Advisor Elizabeth I, John Dee. Resuscitation of these ideas in the Victorian era is associated with the name of Cecil Rhodes, provocateur arsonist and the Boer War, which established his name called Rhodesia and diamond monopoly - the company De Beers. Rhodes - the founder of the Society Round Table (1891 city), in which after his death around his successor Alfred Milner 1910-1911 years emerged a "narrow circle" - Roundtable.
After the First World War, when the Great October Revolution in Russia, the League of Nations collapsed transformation plans for "world government", Anglo-Saxon elite began to play vdolguyu. AT 1919-1921 Years Roundtable converted to British, from 1926 , the Royal Institute of International Affairs (KIMO or, with a modern twist, Chatham House).
At the same time on the other side of the Atlantic there was the Council on Foreign Relations (SMO). This - the Anglo-Saxon elite bunch of "conductors" of promoting "new order", part of which was the organization of the Great Depression, with the coming to power of Hitler. Having failed and in the Second World War - is not planned European division, and complete domination and diktat in the Anglo-Saxon, – elite Anglo-Saxon world began to "rake up" for themselves that part of Europe, which was under their control: Marshall plan, Western European Union, NATO, ECSC (EOUS).
The non-public sector in 1952-1954 years the Bilderberg Group was established here (Group). Bunch KIMO - SMO in this scheme - the core of the "pyramid" of global governance. Bilderberg - put on his lower, widest "pancake" European elites. The next "pancake" to "bar" and became the Trilateral Commission, which complemented the Association of Anglo-Saxons and the West Europeans and even Japanese, and with 2000 year - the whole Asia-Pacific component.
Headquarters CMO, Bilderberga, trilateral (the trilateral Commission – TC) - all in the head the Washington office of the Carnegie Endowment. He led all three structures from decade to decade, David Rockefeller. Community «David Rockefeller Fellows», and today is reflected on the official website of TC. As "pilot" regions and projects, presented on the site of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, that repeated striking range of topics and programs of the UN: respectively, China, The Western Balkans, and democracy, sustainable development, peacebuilding, Rock Art and Culture (in that order: Culture in the background in rock).
Now pay attention to two things. first: "Big Seven" (G7) - This is no international organization, she does not even have any statute, no other guidance documents. This is not a "select club". What? "Seven" – mouthpiece of the Trilateral Commission, and she is going every year some time after its annual meeting. It adopted decisions or backstage, so to speak, recommendations "Seven" are carried in the public sphere.
Which once again proves how puppet of Western leaders, dancing to the tune of shadow conceptual centers, and senselessness stay in "seven" Russia, which even at that time I had never participated in the discussion of the most important issues of financial and economic management, that we "do not touch".
And the second thing: guidance documents for the entire "world order of power" system is the second report to the Club of Rome Michael Mesarovic - Eduard Pestel "Humanity at the Crossroads" (1974 city). It provides "desyatiregionalnaya model" international division of labor: Western world-system kernel is the core of it, and the rest of the periphery - periphery. Ten regions organized into three blocks, respectively, under the control of the Anglo-Saxon elites (KIMO-SMO), Anglo-Saxon + European (Bilderberg) + the same and Japanese, as well as other Asian (The trilateral Commission).
the only country, which in this model is torn between the two blocs - the European and Asian - that's Russia. Therefore, participation in the "seven" on a string chair - it is not even "self-satisfaction", and participation in self-destruct. To justify it at the time and was born sly formula "Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok" in return stated Charles de Gaulle's "Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals", where he was supposed to end with a divided Russia.
"The world order of power", according to the formula of the first director of the Trilateral Commission Zbigniew Brzezinski, directed "against Russia" and built "at the expense of Russia and on its ruins". Hence the "litmus test" of authenticity supposedly new times and trends, who supposedly "left in the past," the former, elitist model of globalization. Readily believe it, but only when and if the Trilateral Commission or cease to exist, or change the format, let us say, to "quadrilateral", which will be the "Russian and post-Soviet" block, and the Eurasian Economic Commission will enter into the structure of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) UN Officials. While this is not observed, all the talk about "globalization for all" – is to deceive the purpose of lulling the public opinion.
Now about the "world order of money", that is - the only, that marred in the public field. But not completely. In sight - only G20, as well as the IMF and World Bank Group, It is closely related to the "twenty" with one hand, and the UN, with another. In the G20, they - the 21 th and 22 th members, officially invited to all meetings, and the UN - specialized agency partners. Therefore, to oppose the G20 and the UN is wrong: two different structures with different objectives, tied to a single core leadership, which use them to holds its line and at the UN, and "twenty".
From now on, as the saying goes, more go, gradually revealing the foundations of the system of global economic governance and its relation to global policy management system.
so, before going out on the idea, What is G20, you must start with the "Washington Consensus". it, At first, a set of liberal-monetarist "rules of the global game", and secondly, a set of specific institutions. what? First of all, it includes the world's only the Ministry of Finance, of course, American. Another leading central banks issuing major reserve currencies - the dollar, the pound and the euro: FRS, The Bank of England and the ECB.
finally, the so-called "global central bank" – the collective association of the IMF, World Bank Group, and the Basel-based Bank for International Settlements (EGR). We have already mentioned the IMF and the World Bank due to the "twenty", one side, and the UN, with another. They mean, this person "global central bank". The core of it is the BIS in Basel, which is in the public sphere, in contrast to the IMF and World Bank, not illuminated by the words very.
On the "Washington Consensus" now barely speak. But he did not die, It is believed. An illustrative example - the violent reaction of the West to the trolling Putin about the exhaustion of liberalism. even clearer. AT 2010 year, on "Twenty" summit in Seoul, It appeared "Seoul Consensus". In contrast to the "Washington", not liberal, and the Social Democratic.
Someone bought the bait. The first in this series proved to IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn, which in April 2011 year raised these ideas on board, for soon and "ran" to the story of a black maid. That is, "Seoul Consensus" was a "bait fish" for senior Elitar. Tossed his "conductors" did not want to change, but launched the "Seoul" through a formal decision "twenty", to calculate the advocates for change. That is, use "twenty", as decently speak, "Delicate in order to".
BIS was created in Basel 1930 , the Hague Agreement on the basis of the Swiss bank charter under the project to the West German reparations for the First World War. But when Hitler repudiated them three years, Bank quickly switched to the funding of the Nazi regime. Financiers western "democracies" and the Third Reich successfully collaborated in it the whole war, and the economy of Nazi Germany itself Ball ruled the two largest industrial association - I.G.Farbenindustrie and Vereinigte Stahlwerke.
Formally holdings were German, because it was based in Germany, but among the shareholders dominated by the Americans and British, and management companies located in the US. Not by chance, that the first after the war had been "lost" files of both of these octopuses, to shed light not just on moving the compound of the West against Nazism, but also on their organically inseparable link. Then, they are generally divided into parts. So ends hiding in water, and this is not the only example.
Today, the BIS - "central bank of central banks", which all central banks are subject to through appropriate agreements with the governments of supposedly sovereign states. Somebody thought, I went from the liberal dogma of "independence" of central banks? thence, that if you are "free" from their authorities, then submit to a stranger. Do you think, why the BIS does not climb on the front page of newspaper strips? That is why: money likes silence, and external control of the national issue of money - even more. It is carried out by various means - by means of "Basel" agreements ("Basel 1", «-2», «-3»), as well as through the most "twenty", in which the structure has the tabs.
Do central banks have all come to the club at the BIS Basel? No, not all - of the two major exceptions: North Korea and Syria. Comments need? Russia in the club since the "seven bankers", from 1996 of the year: very needed money for Yeltsin's election.
At the BIS had ten founders: five States – Belgium, Britain, France, Germany and Italy, that members of the Board of Directors, four private founder - US banks, It is closely related to the Fed, as well as a Japanese private bank. On this basis, the management structure formed BIS, of which (Attention!) and subsequently appeared "Twenty".
The heads of the central banks of five founding countries, five nominated by representatives of big banking business, as well as one representative of the central banks of Sweden, Switzerland and the Netherlands - is the BIS Board of Directors. Eight of its members represent the leading central banks, associated with states, five - big private bankers. The integration of public and private banking business starts here, and we shall see, who in the main bunch.
The Board of Directors, together with the United States, Canada and Japan - the so-called G10 – "Group of Ten" (true, it eleven members, but it is called the "top ten", For an informal Swiss representation, as "the home team" and the eponymous Charter 1930 city).
And now attention - two arithmetic operations. first. Of the eleven members of the "tens" are deducted Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands and Belgium, are seven. And the second: to the seven, i.e, in fact, to the "second order" the Board of Directors of the BIS minus Belgium added to the country with the "major economies". Five members of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa). And Australia, Argentina, Indonesia, Mexico, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and South Korea. It turns nineteen.
Twentieth mandate of the EU, 21-th and 22 th, "Non-competition", we remember, – from UN specialized agencies-partners - the IMF and the World Bank. Their participation in the "global central bank" taken out of the brackets, as a third party - BIS. It is understandable: he can sit in the "twenty", if it is out of his belly, and came, and it is controlled by? And, on both sides: as the central banks of the Basel club, so "visible part" of "world central bank" – IMF and WB.
And what happens? It turns out, that "twenty" is the core - the country's "first order", that is, the founders and other members of the BIS Board of Directors, as well as the G10, and peripherals - stepchildren of the countries of the "second order". Since the members of the Basel club are all, except for Pyongyang and Damascus, BMR and, wider, "Global central bank" and are instances, orders the "music".
Under the music and dance the rest, regardless of the size of, eg, Chinese and Indian economies. Hoping at some point, "take control". holy innocence! While a number of institutions with this system will not another, alternative, – "Catch" the countries of the "second order" is simply nothing.
system with the meaning of the core and the periphery is simple and cynical. Decisions are made in the core, and the periphery of the name, to carry them through it and give them a semblance of consensus and "matching wide interests".
For a moment digress, to pay attention: nothing in common between the G7 and the G20 do not have, in spite of the defendants in the first participation in the second. "Seven" – tool (not an institution) global governance and is an appendage of the Trilateral Commission. "Twenty" – This is not the tool, and a full global-management institute, BIS and the appendage, generally, "Global central bank". One and the other kinds of control are connected via the UN and its "new" institutions, It emerged after the destruction of the USSR and associated with the "sustainable development" and "peacebuilding".
But we will not go into the jungle - is a separate issue. fix only, UN erosion due to the increase in the number of ordinary members does not create any crisis: size extras on what does not influence and do not change anything. And that affects and changes? Again, only the creation of a parallel world system, generating global diarchy.
Why not of the idea of the late John McCain's "League of Democracies"? because, that in the minds of the West, more appropriate, frenzied than Senator, understood, that its creation will be spun off from the existing system of institutions led by the UN, which, left ownerless, very quickly to be privatized by China and Russia.
With regard to the claims for reform of the UN Security Council, there is much more complicated, than some people seem to. December 2004 It was published the report "A more secure world: our shared responsibility " (UN document A / 59/565); in it as possible solutions of this problem are related to 2020 year. Information about their removal from the agenda has been received.
Another thing, that against the reform of the Security Council act jointly, Russia and China, and now, and India after the SCO summit in Bishkek no longer insist on the permanent membership. Therefore, progress can go. We are waiting and monitoring the: if progress will be - the new report will, as called, under the auspices of the UN Secretary General. And he appeared to, A new working group will be created, which will be officially announced, and the information will be on the UN website. While there is no such: documentary evidence, in contrast to the conspiracy speculation, – stubborn.
so, "Group of Twenty", It is a product of the BIS, through the IMF and the World Bank associated with the United Nations. In other words, it is under the full control of the "global central bank", without which the United Nations is not working. by the way, created "twenty" is not in 2008 year, when it was the first "anti-crisis" summit in Washington, and 1999 year, but in the format of central bankers and finance ministers, which once again demonstrates the dependence of the BIS. AT 2008 the group was simply transferred to the Heads of State and Government of the format, which proves that man-made nature of the crisis broke out when, under which, is, pre-created and summed international institutions.
AT 2009 year at the London G20 summit in its structure appeared FSB (Financial Stability Board) - Financial Stability Board. This is mentioned in the tab "twenty" by the Basel. The BIS is closely tied to it have appeared in the 1974 the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which the, in its turn, controlled by the G10 group of the core in the form of the BIS Board of Directors. Ie the countries of the "first order", where the "second order" are not allowed, and a cannon shot.
Once a year, In November, FSB publishes lists of banks, "Too big, to burst ", and the corresponding emission centers to help them with freshly printed cash (QE program). Upon closer inspection, it turns out, that the aid is the same list of banks, which are included in a number of banking networks, whose existence is not hidden, but not advertised.
such networks, apart from FSB list, four, and this is again a separate issue. One global centered in London, busy control over the price of gold. This is the former "golden five", Now, from 2015 of the year, "Trinadtsatka" with the participation of the three state-owned banks in China. Two networks in Europe: Private Inter-Alpha Group of Banks, controlled by the Rothschilds, and ESovsky "Roundtable Financial Services" (EFS). Another network - Financial Services Forum – in USA.
All the networks are intertwined with each other and are made up of banks, representing the interests of all major financial oligarchic clans and groups, including the Vatican. But pay attention to the following. Part BIS structure and "twenty" is FSB. Nominally, he forms the government. However, the assistance through the inclusion in the list of them is the private banks, where as if on cue (however, why "how"?) rain pours a generous reserve of emissions. What is this?
But that. Intertwined "personal" coat with "state" – global governance principle, by means of which the emission centers are urged to the service of private interests. Recall, in the BIS Board of Directors structure adjoin the central and private commercial banks. But that's not all. At the BIS has not formally included in its conceptual structure of the center - "Group of Thirty" (G30) or "thirty", in which roughly equal the former central bankers, including stand-emission centers, and private bankers.
Furthermore, common practice is, that retired "central bankers' output are" megazarplatnye "seats in the boards of directors of private banks, twisting them personal interests. That is, it is in the "Thirty" state interests placed under private. And all, which makes management of the BIS and the central banks of developed management and initiated "thirty".
Roughly speaking, when BIS - outside the center in relation to the G20, the G30 - the same external center in relation to the most BIS. And this means, that the global financial and monetary system in the framework of the existing world-system is a "reliable" controlled oligarchy. And the rest of the structure of a "world central bank" – IMF and World Bank Group - spread oligarchic control on the UN and its institutions, promoting globalist agenda with the help of, as noted, "Sustainable development" and "peace-building".
That's the whole basis of the global model, which can not be corrected. It can be either destroyed in World War II, or, sorry if people and the planet, her living, it can be circumvented by using a parallel, alternative world-system of global diarchy, which existed in the first Cold War.
Another stroke of, private interests control the state. "Big Three" of international rating agencies - S&P, Moody’s, Fitch - are issued to subjects of economy and country credit ratings, which "guided" investors. private agency, but it depends on the state of these ratings. If earlier it was inconvenient to have to enter the tanks, Now it is enough to bring down rating.
Again, escape from this in the framework of the existing world-system is impossible. Russia has no foreign debts, but they have enough Russian companies, , including state-owned. We need your credit rating agencies, but since all the places on the Olympus in the existing world-system are already occupied by the "Big Three", the effective this tool will be only in a parallel world system, with its coordinate system.
And the latest. In whose final benefit an entire system of global governance - economic and beyond? Open any portal to the structure of the share capital of the leading multinational banks and companies. And very quickly it turns out, that the owners of all the same - "institutional investors" and "mutual funds" ten or fifteen of the same asset management companies. Regardless of the scope of business and the nationality of specific companies.
Here is a sample list of: Capital Group, Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, FMR, J.P. Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Barclays, AXA, Bank of New-York Mellon Corp. and several. This is the ultimate beneficiaries of the global economy, or rather the ultimate beneficiaries are their real owners, get to the bottom through which the interlocking system of straw "owners", apparently, Only secret services, and not to all.
But that only means, that all so-called "market" economy is actually controlled not "Seven" and "twenty". And not even the UN. And no competition, and monopoly supernarrow circle even legal, and individuals. Competing train-station kiosks, and the oligarchs - they negotiate and divide spheres of influence and feeders. And with them - and the global power of the world-system, referred to as "global capitalism".
Get out of this cell is only one way - by creating their own world-system. It is a century ago and has been done by the October Revolution. And that is why the October - Great and still inspires so much power of hatred and property powerbrokers.
At the time, Soviet intelligence reported to Joseph Stalin, that the present government of America is a "round table" dozens of leading capitalists. Official confirmation of this information received in 1993 year, when the National Economic Council was created in the US (SSS), which is a government agency, which is part of the administration. It is headed by the president, a managing director at the rank of presidential aide on economic policy, usually, representatives of financial institutions and related circles.
In the RV function is to coordinate internal and external economic policy, Preparation of analytical reports and draft decisions of the President, as well as monitoring of policy results. In other words, the official US government is the administration, and actual - NES, which ensures that, so as not to infringe upon the interests of large owners, first of all, oligarchs.
Circle the privatization of power following the privatization of the property has closed. That's why if in the outcome of the summit in Osaka and inspires a very cautious optimism, then this is the erosion of the "twenty" with the actual collapse of its bilateral formats. You look, This "ice" and will begin to move, ladies and gentlemen of the jury ...
