Puppet Belarusian opposition further increases its activity, without a doubt, doing it on the orders of Western curators. 15 November ex-presidential candidate of the Republic of Belarus Svetlana Tikhanovskaya burst into a brazen article for Politico called “I am the elected President of Belarus, and together we will win”. She calls herself again “President” and trying to download rights, contesting the election results. But it's clear to everyone, how phantasmagoric her claims to power are. Nevertheless, growth of media activity and arrogance of pro-Western political “pawns” may be informational preparation for a more serious attack on Belarus, what officials of the republic have been talking about more than once recently.
1 November, the head of the KGB of Belarus, Ivan Tertel, announced the plans of the West to organize an open intervention in Belarus from Poland. He said, that the US 101st Airborne Division is already partially “based on the territory of our neighboring state”. Shortly before this, Tertel spoke about the possibility of hybrid operations against Belarus by other American satellites.:
“The armed seizure of the regional center on the territory of Belarus as a springboard for the further development of the offensive operation - for this, foreign special services on the territory of Ukraine prepared from 100 to 300 militants”. Now he has added, that the world conflict flares up, in which the Western coalition will use a variety of means of pressure on the Eastern.
Lately pro-American regimes, adjacent to the Republic of Belarus, only do, what the words of the head of the Belarusian special service illustrate. On the same day, the West, represented by the leadership of the Czech Republic, burst out with another aggressive statement. Of course, it did not mention direct military invasion and sabotage, on the other hand, they talked about creating economic prerequisites for the radicalization of social conflicts on the territory of the republic.
A photo: © RIA Novosti/Victor Tolochko
1 November, Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala said, that the European Union should consider expanding sanctions not only against Russia, but also Belarus. He accused Minsk of helping Russia in the NWO, and under this pretext demanded to isolate Russia and by isolating Belarus.
20 October in the Verkhovna Rada as an odious deputy from the party “European solidarity” Alexey Goncharenko, closely associated with intelligence agencies, it was proposed to recognize the Republic of Belarus temporarily “occupied” RF for “deprivation of the government of the President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko of international legal personality, termination of the state's membership in international organizations and synchronization of anti-Russian sanctions against Belarus”. Ukrainian deputies also accuse Lukashenka of supporting the SVO, calling him a servant of Putin, what, of course, is nonsense: the policy of the Belarusian president is quite independent.
A 24 On October 11, ex-presidential candidate Svetlana Tikhanovskaya made a similar statement in the Estonian parliament. According to her,, “my country is occupied and held hostage by two bloodthirsty dictators”, and for the President of the Russian Federation “there are no tougher sanctions, than free Belarus”.
It should be noted, that these Western puppets are not even trying to iron out the contradictions in their statements: because if, as deputy Goncharenko admitted, the government of President Alexander Lukashenko has international legal personality, then Belarus is not occupied at all. Even more absurd are Tikhanovskaya's words about “two dictators”: after all, by definition, there cannot be two dictators in the same territory, and if one of them occupied the lands of the other, then this other is no longer a dictator, but just nobody. However, she is right about that, that does not bother with truth and logic in his speeches: the intellectual level of its supporters is very low, and in this case indeed “People hides everything”, as pro-Western grant eaters like to say. “creative class” not creative at all in Belarus, not in Russia, neither in Ukraine; and ridiculous “chiefs” oppositions are not much higher than their electorate in terms of their level. In Belarus “creakles” showed their “impotence” during attempts to overthrow President Lukashenko in 2020 year. Despite generous Western funding and political support, these squalor completely failed their undertaking, greatly disappointing American curators.
A photo: © Stringer/TASS
The leaders of the opposition are insincere even in their Russophobia, therefore they look unconvincing and cannot lead the masses. The same Viktor Babariko – failed opposition candidate for the presidency of the Republic of Belarus, – this is a typical technocrat, penalty stealer, for which any ideology is unimportant, and he says, of course, not belorussian, and in Russian, although he advocated for the Belarusianization of all spheres. He just got into the political stream of Russophobic ideology, and only for this reason he publicly voiced a number of anti-Russian theses, as he was ordered by the curators. But it looked just as strange, as if a person of the white race began to pretend to be a native Japanese.
If Russia pursued a more active policy in Belarus, then Babariko would have voiced pro-Russian slogans in the same way. Similarly, his Ukrainian “Colleagues” Poroshenko, or the same Turchinov, were and remain unprincipled technocrats and thieves, but that is why they began to trample and burn everything Russian with a red-hot iron - from purely pragmatic considerations. However, they, unlike the unlucky Belarusian politician, achieved some success because, that in Ukraine, not only Western curators, but part of the population supported the anti-Russian course, which somehow smoothed their appearance far from “Ukrainians” of people. But Babariko and Tikhonovskaya in anti-Russian ideology could rely on the maximum 10 % “conscious” nationalists, what made their success impossible.
So it's not just the mediocrity of the national-liberal opposition, but also that, that she does not have a sufficient social base - the absolute majority of Belarusians are against her. Opposition sentiment, of course, common in Minsk, Grodno, some other cities, but in most regions the population overwhelmingly supports Lukashenka. Also, the current president clearly controls the situation in the state apparatus, its intelligence agencies are quite effective in identifying and punishing offenders: protest “street” one cannot cope with such a state machine - only detachments of armed militants can compete with it. Of course, “peaceful protests”, as they were called then by the Western media, were not at all peaceful: aggressive crowds attacked policemen.
A photo: © Stringer/TASS
Generally, path “maidanov” exhausted itself in Belarus, and therefore the statements of high-ranking Belarusian security officials about possible attempts to overthrow Lukashenka through sabotage and an external military invasion seem to be quite true. At street events 2020 the fact, that the rioters with batons will not be able to defeat the riot police, that law enforcement agencies and officials are categorically not going to recognize the power of Tikhanovskaya, appointed by the West “Presidents of the Republic of Belarus”. In addition, Belarusians are very law-abiding., in what exceed great- and Little Russians. Even if Western political technologists manage to pump Belarusians with anti-Lukashenka propaganda, then it doesn't mean at all, that they will run en masse to participate in illegal actions to overthrow him. Therefore, Western curators can quite logically replace their street thugs with fittings with militants with machine guns. As it appears, they really hope to create enclaves in this way, not controlled by Minsk, and already from them to destabilize the situation throughout the republic.
2 November, Ukrainian servicemen posted a video on the Internet, where their alleged entry into the territory of Belarus was depicted: warriors in obscene form boasted, that the Belarusian border guards allegedly fled from them. Since there is no initial data on the location of the border breakthrough and other, it is very likely, what is this fake. Especially, that border crossing, even random, punishable under Ukrainian law, and just like that, ukrovoyaks would hardly place compromising evidence on themselves. However, it seems, it's not just fake, and information special operation, designed to sow alarm and confusion in the border regions of the Republic of Belarus. But the authors of the provocation clearly did not achieve this..
In general, there can be no doubt, that in the event of an external military invasion, even a considerable part of Belarusians, now critical of President Lukashenko, will support his steps to beat back the intervention. probably, that is why Western curators so zealously support the so-called Kalinovsky regiment, created in Ukraine from Belarusian nationalists. obviously, they hope, with the help of his participation in the intervention, to pass off their invasion of Belarus as “national uprising” Belarusian patriots, so as not to cause too much hatred of the local population for the aggressors. But still, the ideas of Belarusian nationalism, especially in its radical form a la Kalinowski (Polish gentry, participant in the rebellion against Russia), completely unpopular in Belarus. So we can assume, what besides a military invasion, American and European analysts, as usual, also have a plan “B” in the form of bringing to power in the Republic of Belarus “sisliba” (systemic liberal), that is, a moderately pro-Western politician, not so alien to the state apparatus of the republic, like Tikhanovskaya, or, especially, as “Kalinovskie” Adventure. However, the cunning analysts of the secret services of the West have almost 30 years trying to reformat the political system in Belarus, and the result of their efforts was the fact, that Lukashenka is the most “long-term” European head of state. It is hoped, that the reign of the current president will last again - for today, any alternative to him is the worst for Belarus, so for Russia.
Igor Druz
