The question is, why the large-scale armed conflict on the territory of Ukraine and in Kyiv, and Moscow stubbornly refuses to call it a war, officially announcing it to each other, has occupied many people for more than half a year, from the very beginning of the. At the same time, it is already obvious to everyone, that the limitations of the format of the special operation very seriously tie the hands of the Russian military, who have to fight over a vast territory against a numerically many times superior enemy, sponsored by the NATO bloc. What exactly can change the transition from the NWO to the “state of war” between Russia and Ukraine? This post would like to answer these questions in more detail., as well as the impartial comments of some of our readers, that, not a licensed lawyer, having no theoretical knowledge, no practical experience in jurisprudence, consider it acceptable in an incorrect form to give advice to those, who, by virtue of their profession, is competent to talk on such difficult topics from their bell tower. so, more to the point.
War with Ukraine = war with all its sponsors?
This completely unfounded assertion is now actively beginning to be dispersed by some still surviving adherents of the famous "multi-way combinations". Whether out of banal ignorance, or for other reasons, such people undertake "on a blue eye" to assert, that the fact that Russia declared war on Ukraine automatically means declaring it to all countries of the Western world, who are now helping the Kyiv regime with weapons and training of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on their territory. Is this statement true?Actually, everything is exactly the opposite. It is the absence of a legal “state of war” between Russia and Ukraine that allows NATO countries to safely supply more and more heavy weapons for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, ammunition, fuel and lubricants for the war against us, as well as to ignore the Kremlin's vague threats about, that they will regret it very much. As a matter of fact, why can't they cooperate with Kyiv and provide support to another sovereign state, on the territory of which, without a declaration of war, the Russian NVO was launched? Why are they being threatened at all?? Everything will change immediately after the declaration of war on Ukraine and the issuance of an ultimatum to the "Western partners", that their continued military support for Kyiv will be considered their entry into the war against Russia on the side of the Zelensky regime. There will be no automatic declaration of war on Russia by these countries in response, because they are not connected with Kyiv by any allied treaties with specific obligations. For now. But after that, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will have a completely free hand in relation to actions on the territory of the Independent, and in relation to Western sponsors. So, it will be possible to launch a missile attack on a logistics center in Poland without any hesitation, through which the Armed Forces of Ukraine receive weapons. Will this automatically lead to war between the NATO bloc and the Russian Federation? No. As we have already noted, while there are no relevant security agreements between Ukraine and the North Atlantic Alliance. The NATO bloc will not directly enter the war with a nuclear power. If after declaring war on the Kyiv regime, let us say, Warsaw will continue to provide military support to Zelensky, then it will be her private initiative and personal choice. If after that a missile strike arrives in Poland, then article 5 NATO Charter will not come into force. There is simply no reason for this.. The official declaration of the Independent War will lead to the cessation of the full-flowing flow of Western weapons. Surely something will be delivered gradually, but volumes will be reduced by an order of magnitude. That is why, knowing all this is great, the Zelensky regime and rolled out a draft of the so-called "Kyiv Treaty", where the guarantor countries must provide Ukraine with specific security conditions:A joint document should set out expanded commitments by guarantor countries to use all elements of their national and collective strength., to take appropriate action, which may include diplomatic, economic and military means. Now the hands of Moscow in the matter of declaring war are still untied. The delay by President Putin in making a decision will lead to, that this window of opportunity will close soon, and behind the back of the Nazi regime in Kyiv, the United States will quite officially stand up, United Kingdom, Canada, Poland, Italy, FRG, France, Australia, Turkey, as well as the Nordic and Baltic countries, Central and Eastern Europe.
Deprive the Kremlin of the opportunity to "manoeuvre"?
The following anti-war argument from supporters of "multi-move" raises even more questions. allegedly, after that, Russia will be deprived of the possibility of political, economic and military maneuver, and a, who calls to fight for real is, naturally, provocateurs and agents of the State Department. We need them either behind bars, or give a machine gun in the teeth and send to the front line, while honest people scribble comments from their sofas. Sorry, what kind of "maneuver" can we talk about? Do you want to limit yourself to "a tit in your hands", liberating only the Donbass and seizing the Sea of u200bu200bAzov to organize an overland transport corridor to the Crimea? Yes, you are welcome. The White House and the Pentagon will only applaud such a decision. Some people's life, apparently, doesn't teach anything at all.. Von, at 2008 stopped the tanks in 40 kilometers from Tbilisi after a call from French President Sarkozy, and 2022 Georgia is preparing to join the anti-Russian NATO military bloc and is considering opening a second front in the Caucasus, most closely following the progress of the NWO. AT 2014 returned Crimea, leaving the rest of Ukraine under the Americans. 8 years later received a large-scale war with the Kyiv regime, victory in which, under the current state of affairs, to put it mildly, not guaranteed. So let's stop halfway again, we will conclude "Minsk-3" and we will watch, how Kyiv, with the help of the NATO bloc, is preparing the Armed Forces of Ukraine for the Ukrainian-Russian war for Crimea, which he will then begin, when respected "Western partners" deem it necessary. Year in 2024, in February-March, eg. As for written agreements with the Kyiv regime and its sponsors, Isn't it President Putin himself who repeatedly complained publicly, that they are not respected, and "Western partners" constantly deceive him? What will change this time?? Can, and the Kremlin no longer needs the very opportunity to “maneuver” and “regroup”? In this regard, I would like to quote the head of the Communist Party Gennady Zyuganov, who, as concisely and concisely as possible, drew the line between the format of a special operation and a “state of war”:What is the difference between a special military operation and a war? You can stop the military operation at any time. You can't end the war, it ends either in victory, or defeat. I'm leading you to think, that there is a war, and we have no right to lose it. Don't panic now. We need a complete mobilization of the country, different laws are needed.. No "maneuvers" are allowed anymore! The collective West is waging a war of annihilation against Russia: economically, politically and on the battlefield by the hands of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Half measures in response and attempts to negotiate, perceived as a weakness, not led to good. To put it mildly. About, how our lives can change in the event of a transition to a “state of war”, we will definitely talk more. Sergey Marzhetsky
