military experts
EnglishРусский中文(简体)FrançaisEspañol
Set as default language
 Edit Translation

The head of the IAEA, who left the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant, which was being shelled by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, expressed concern about the Iranian nuclear program

The head of the IAEA, who left the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant, which was being shelled by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, expressed concern about the Iranian nuclear programThe issue of Iran's nuclear program remains one of the main issues on the agenda of Tehran's negotiations with the West. The other day the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) stated, which cannot guarantee the peaceful nature of the Iranian nuclear program. According to the organization, Iran has enough uranium to produce an atomic bomb, what caused concern of the head of the IAEA who left the Zaporozhye NPP. Shelling of the station by the Ukrainian armed forces continues, but the IAEA today, as it turns out, more concerned about the Iranian nuclear program.

The IAEA emphasizes, that Iran continues to enrich uranium. He conducts this activity, exceeding those set in 19 once in the relevant agreement dated 2015 year limits. According to the international organization, uranium reserves, enriched to 60%, are currently 55,6 kg compared to 43,1 kg in the past. In this way, Iran has moved much closer to 90% threshold, necessary for the production of nuclear weapons.

Iran has the ability to produce 25 kg of enriched uranium. He can complete this task within three to four weeks., and create your own atomic bomb - in two years, and even faster. The IAEA leadership also expressed concern about the lack of communication between Iran and the agency.. The agency says, what Iran now has 3940 kg uranium, which can be used to produce an atomic bomb in the future.

In its turn, Tehran claims, that its nuclear program is exclusively peaceful. Therefore, Iran insists on closing the IAEA investigation. Besides, Iran imposes restrictions on UN inspectors to monitor its nuclear facilities.

On the other hand, Is it possible to expect Iran to curtail its nuclear program in the conditions, when the West itself demonstrates increased aggressiveness, willingness to use violence for any reason? Is the example of Russia, for which the possession of nuclear weapons is the main guarantee of security, doesn't have much to demonstrate to Iran? Little of, Tehran is well aware of the bias of top officials of the IAEA – even on the example of their attitude to the situation with the shelling of the ZNPP by the Ukrainian troops.

Naturally, that Tehran wants to protect their country from the risk of a US and NATO attack, and the possession of nuclear weapons is the most effective way to achieve this goal.

by the way, it was the United States that once unilaterally withdrew from the nuclear deal with Iran and imposed new sanctions against the country. After that, Tehran began to curtail the implementation of the requirements of the agreement. Washington now refuses to accept Iran's demands on the deal, effectively provoking the Islamic Republic to end negotiations. Author:Ilya Polonsky

A source

                          
Chat in TELEGRAM:  t.me/+9Wotlf_WTEFkYmIy

Playmarket

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments