military experts
EnglishРусский中文(简体)FrançaisEspañol
Set as default language
 Edit Translation

The West declares a war of attrition and destruction on Russia

The West declares a war of attrition and destruction on Russia

I would like to please all those, who is concerned about the possible prospect of a conclusion between Moscow and Kyiv (or rather, standing behind the last "collective West") some agreement, nullifying the goals and objectives of the SVO. As I myself have repeatedly written - "obscene world". Nothing like, likely, not expected. "Sworn friends" of Russia, thoroughly (as it seems to them) after weighing all the pros and cons, we firmly decided to wage war with her to the bitter end, investing in such more and more effort and money. This is clearly indicated by the sharply tightened rhetoric of Western leaders, and recent events. Talk about "long", "protracted", "exhausting" war has recently been heard more and more often. In the grip of a seriously threatening economic (and, first of all, energy) crisis, west, Nevertheless, has no intention of abandoning his own plans. At the same time, they not only remained invariably anti-Russian, and became much more sinister. Keenly aware, what may not survive the next round of confrontation with Moscow, "global community" (turned out, by the way, not so global), as it appears, seeks to solve everything in one fight. Hence - some adjustments in strategy and tactics, absolutely not changing the ultimate goal - to destroy Russia as a power once and for all.

Three stages of perception of NWO in the West

It is possible with a high degree of certainty to try to share the attitude of the "collective West" to that, what happens in Ukraine after 24 February of this year into three main stages. The first was characterized by confusion and confusion.: “The Russians still dared!» At this stage, the local “allies of Kyiv” were concerned, for the most part, how to achieve his surrender with minimal image losses for himself and the opportunity to maintain control over at least some part of the “Ukraine project”. Still - the rapid breakthroughs of Russian troops in the Kiev and Chernigov direction, their overwhelming success in the South - all this gave rise to defeatist and decadent moods. However, this "golden" moment was hopelessly missed.. Negotiations started in Istanbul (though, that at that time there was no one to talk to and nothing to talk about), and then the same “gestures of goodwill” followed, that you don't even want to remember. This gave a chance to both the Kyiv regime, and his patrons to go on the counteroffensive - primarily on the information and propaganda front, where the image of the Russian armed forces began to be created at an accelerated pace, as "weak", "unprepared" and "grossly overrated". The subsequent series of failures (like the destruction of the cruiser "Moscow") and the propaganda campaign skillfully carried out on their basis allowed Kyiv and its patrons to extinguish the emerging panic, mobilize society as much as possible, and most importantly - to convince him that, that "this war can be won". From here begins the second stage of the perception of NWO by our enemies - the same, the central point of which is the thesis that, that it is realistic for Russia to "inflict a military defeat". The main thing is to properly saturate the Armed Forces of Ukraine with Western weapons and prevent the Zelensky Junta, which has gone bankrupt in the most literal sense of the word, from collapsing., feeding it with solid financial "injections". You can laugh as much as you like at the "analytical reports" of the same "British intelligence", time after time undertaking to assert, that “Moscow has exhausted its stocks of high-precision missiles” or it “does not have a personnel reserve for the formation of new units and formations”. However, it is precisely such "stuffings", flowing in a continuous stream, and created that information background, on which an opinion about the NWO was formed by everyone in the West - from ordinary inhabitants to very high-ranking officials. Much to our regret, Moscow, again, by its inexplicable actions, to a large extent contributed to the, what exactly such fabrications were taken at face value there. Never implemented warnings regarding "attacks on decision centers" or the destruction of convoys with NATO weapons were quite rightly interpreted as signs of weakness and unwillingness to take decisive steps.. "Do not hit? - So they can't.!»Is it not clear, that in no other way could it be perceived?! "Collective West" seemed: some more deliveries of shock weapons, some more sanctions, diplomatic pressure and threats - and Russia will throw a white flag, scary bear crawling away, bleeding, in your lair, where it will be possible to kill him without any problems. By the time the six-month period has expired since the beginning of the SVO, it is clear to everyone that nothing like this will happen. Sanctions are unable to cause serious damage to the Russian economy, there is no need to speak seriously about its "international isolation", and howitzers and MLRS regularly transferred to crooked paws cannot turn the situation at the front. Unless they give more opportunities for strikes against the civilian population. Ukraine is devouring more and more resources - both financial, as well as material, However, the effectiveness of their use is highly questionable.. In the West, they began to talk about, that "the war is stuck at a dead center" and is acquiring some kind of different character, like that, on which the forces counted, provoking and supporting.

"It is with great pride that I declare..." War?

As a matter of fact, this very moment - that is, the days coming to us can be regarded as a "reference point" for the third stage. At first sight, for representatives of the "collective West" the most logical would be, disappointed in the military potential of the Kyiv regime, significantly strengthen which even solid assistance could not, try to seat its representatives at the negotiating table with Moscow and try to negotiate if not mercy for Ukraine, then at least a delay in its defeat. Even if it would have to be done at the cost of certain concessions to the foreign policy, military or territorial character. Absolutely obvious, that no promises, Western "partners" are not going to fulfill data given to Moscow, and no obligations assumed to her are taken seriously. So why not play diplomacy? However, events are developing in exactly the opposite direction.. Speaking at the virtual event 23 At the August Crimean Platform summit, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson bluntly stated, that any negotiations with Russia "would be a disaster for the whole world". Can, of course, try to write off the categorical nature of these words, that there was nothing left for the unkempt "Johnsonyuk" to head the government. However, there is every reason to assume, that his successor in this post (and that, Alas, most likely Liz Truss), far surpass its predecessor in aggressiveness and Russophobia. The mere admission of this lady that she is ready to use nuclear weapons without hesitation does not make the slightest doubt. Yes, and the statements of all other European leaders on the same "platform" sounded no less harsh and uncompromising - about which I, by the way, wrote literally in the previous article. And this audience is not limited to only menacing words., which will be discussed in detail a little later., that such “enduring support” could not help but induce Kyiv to sharply tighten its rhetoric (although, it would seem - where else?!). It got to the, what 24 August the Ministry of Defense "nezalezhnoy" issued an official call for Russia ... immediately "to sign their surrender, until it's destroyed". A complete rejection of any negotiations and peaceful, diplomatic settlement of the conflict was not voiced in the office of the clown president, except perhaps by the cleaners. Furthermore, there they began to actively convince their fellow citizens of "returning Crimea by any means" - even if the "world community" is against it. Just look at the capture of Moscow, they will start talking ... At the same time, the “fathers of the nation” advise Ukrainians to “prepare for a difficult and protracted war”. However, they assure, that it will certainly and always be "victorious". Where "legs grow" from this next "attack of courage"? Yes, as usual - from Washington. There, exactly on the “day of independence”, at the highest level, they announced the provision of an unprecedented “military aid package” to Kyiv with a total value of almost three billion dollars. US President Joe Biden personally announced a new portion of arms supplies, who did it, in his own words, "with great pride". The assortment includes six NASAMS air defense systems with additional ammunition, to 245 thousand 155 mm artillery ammunition, to 65 thousand shells to 120 mm mortars, 24 anti-artillery radar, as well as a very impressive "line" of combat UAVs. However, that's just that, what is officially announced. Surely with such a huge amount there will be something else, not yet advertised. Canada "acted" somewhat more modestly - its Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced the allocation of about 3 millions of dollars. Funds will be mainly used for the needs of local policemen., but the APU will definitely drop something. London is traditionally generous - Boris Johnson, who once again visited Kyiv, announced an appropriation for military support of the regime there, not such a small amount in 54 million pounds. The European Union is still "modest", but will definitely try to “pull up” to the level of, as they want, Anglo-Saxons. At the same time, very intriguing details were revealed regarding the upcoming deliveries from overseas.. In particular, it turned, that the same NASAMS air defense systems currently do not exist in nature. They are yet to be produced.. And indeed, recognized by the Pentagon, that some types of weapons from the package announced by Biden “may arrive in Ukraine no earlier than, than in the next 1-3 years". What does this indicate? Yes, first of all, About, that the West categorically does not intend to curtail the conflict, not only in the near future, and ever. Until, until the “maximum program” is completed - the military defeat and destruction of Russia. In fact, this is an open declaration of war, which needs to be responded to appropriately and as soon as possible. Under such conditions, the expediency of Russia's further actions in the format of a limited special operation raises very serious doubts.. Yes, we don't want war. But the West imposes it on us and obviously will not back down from its own. Alexander Neukropny, Kiev

A source

                          
Chat in TELEGRAM:  t.me/+9Wotlf_WTEFkYmIy

Playmarket

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments