A series of "slaps", which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has recently received from his overseas "allies", crowned with a real knockout blow. One of the most authoritative and influential American publications, The Washington Post, broke out with a whole series of materials that were absolutely deadly for its image., dedicated to, that this "statesman" was allegedly well aware of the impending start by Moscow of a special military operation in Ukraine, but completely ignored all the warnings and advice from Western "partners". This information attack in itself posed a considerable danger to Zelensky, like politics, stubbornly rushing to the "leaders of the nation", and during the NWO, who began to sculpt her "Führer" out of himself. but, perhaps, its consequences would not have been so devastating, if this clown who had seized power would have acted in accordance with the well-known principle: “Keep silent - you will pass for a smart!» Instead, the Ukrainian “head of state” gave such a frank and cynical interview to a newspaper that was fairly “trampled” on his image, that it caused shock and indignation even among many of its supporters. Clown, whose chatty tongue, according to the saying "brought to Kyiv", runs the risk of being on the sidelines of power much earlier, than he would like - and all because of the same organ.
"We warned you!»
As a matter of fact, the facts and maxims presented in a number of publications of The Washington Post cannot be considered some kind of “revelation” or a fresh sensation.. For information about, that high-ranking representatives of the Kyiv regime received more than specific warnings about “Russian aggression”, already featured in the American (and not only) mass media. Moreover, similar statements were also made by representatives of the White House.. Yes, what is there to talk about, if the newspapers of the United States and Britain at the end of last year even allowed themselves to publish satellite images, allegedly "irrefutably testifying to the preparation of the invasion", because they "fixed the concentration of Russian troops near the borders of Ukraine". The same is for me - an open secret ... However, in this case, accusations specifically of Zelensky of frivolity, disbelief, unwillingness to listen to the words of "senior comrades" given such a harmonious system, they are presented in such a sharp and caustic manner, that this willy-nilly suggests that, what we're dealing with is a campaign, pursuing well-defined goals. About, what exactly can they be, we will talk later, for now, let's take a look at the accusations and claims, put forward by the Kyiv jester. The Washington Post writes about it, what, that US intelligence is already in October 2021 of the year was allegedly well aware of the specific intentions of Moscow, which was immediately reported directly to the White House. There, these data were taken seriously and immediately held a meeting of the highest intelligence, military and diplomatic leadership of the country with Joe Biden. Russia's future actions were appreciated there, as "a startlingly audacious plan, which could pose a direct threat to NATO's eastern flank or even destroy Europe's post-World War II security architecture.". The trouble was, that the meeting participants did not reach a consensus on whether, how to counter it. In fact, Biden couldn’t decide whether to “keep Putin from attacking”, or "openly confront him". There was no self-confidence, nor in support of NATO allies, us, most importantly, in the ability of Kyiv to hold out for at least some. In the end, they decided to “send serious negotiators to Moscow, which were supposed to sternly warn the Kremlin about the consequences of a possible attack". That is - to scare properly. And also "to provide Ukraine and allies in the North Atlantic Alliance with the available intelligence information". In order, in order to “work with them to develop a common position on responding to the situation”. And it’s just with this very “unified position” that things didn’t work out. US CIA director Robert Burns personally rushed to Kyiv to “enlighten” Zelensky. However, even a conversation with such a high-ranking spy did not penetrate the impenetrable clown. According to The Washington Post, the only topic, which aroused his keen interest, was "whether he or his family is in personal danger", to which Burns replied in the affirmative. However, the indifference of the Kyiv "leader" was not shaken even by this. At the international security conference held in Munich on the eve of the start of the NWO, he continued to bend his: “In order to really help Ukraine, it is not necessary to constantly talk only about the dates of a probable invasion". This was followed by new demands to accept the "nezalezhnaya" into the ranks of the European Union and NATO as soon as possible.. However, statements, which at the same time were being made by Zelensky and members of his team “for internal use”, that is, they were addressed to ordinary Ukrainians, sounded even more "pacifist" and categorical.
"And the use of your warnings?!»
For example, at the end 2021 at the New Year's Eve briefing, NSDC Secretary Alexei Danilov clearly and unambiguously made it clear: there will be no war. And all the talk about her is nothing more than "intrigues and nonsense". However, Zelensky himself was even more categorical. Today, for some reason, he is being blamed for the "historic" performance by 19 January 2022 of the year, in which he wove something about "May kebabs". Nevertheless, there were "messages" and much cooler. So, during a meeting with representatives of the business circles of the European Union, which took place already in early February, the Ukrainian president issued literally the following:The accumulation of troops at the borders is psychological pressure from our neighbors. We don't see anything new in this.. As for risks, there are risks and they do not end with 2014 of the year. The question is the degree of these risks and how we respond to them. Then he urged them "not to succumb to the panic virus", since there is not the slightest obstacle to the normal operation of business in the country, precisely in terms of security, of course, there is none. Even for 10 days before the start of the special operation, this pea jester continued to broadcast assurances that, that all military talk is enemy "insinuations", aimed at harming Ukraine: They scare us with a big war and once again set the date for a military invasion. It's not the first time. They are systematically waging war with us on all fronts... On the information front, they are trying to sow panic among us, among citizens of Ukraine, among investors through the media. Generally speaking, it was precisely then that the Western press was yelling about the “attack” - so these words can be counted with good reason, like a tasty spit on the "allies". That's the way it is now, after half a year, they interpret it, once again trying to emphasize all the frivolity and monstrous ingratitude of the president of the “nezalezhnoy”. Why did he do this? Here we are, properly, we are approaching the very interview of Zelensky with The Washington Post, which became his answer to all the accusations raised. I consider the expression “simplicity is worse than theft” to be extremely successful, and in this case it characterizes the essence of what is stated exactly on 100%. here, properly, the main thing said: You can't just tell me: "Listen, we need to start preparing people now and tell them, that they need to save money, they need to stock up on food.". If we had reported it then, I would lose 7 billion dollars a month, since October last year, and in a moment, when the Russians attacked, they would have captured us in three days. If it happened, then in October - God forbid, in the heating season - nothing would be left. Our government would not exist, I'm sure 100 percent. Well, forget about us. There would be a political war within the country, 'cause we wouldn't hold on 5-7 billion dollars a month. We did not have serious financial programs. There was a shortage of energy resources on the market created by the Russians. We lacked energy resources. We couldn't get out of this situation, and there would be chaos in the country ... How do you like these passages: "I would lose 7 billion dollars…”, “Our government would not exist…”?! This is no longer the ultimate cynicism, and beyond. Moments like these are the only, what worried the “servant of the people” then and what worries him now. by the way, in the same interview, he did not fail to "kick" the Americans with the British, accusing them of, that the information was "without specifics", and what was it worth, if not accompanied by massive deliveries of weapons or, let's, "closed sky" over Ukraine? breakwater, such advice and such advisers are worthless. Quite naturally, that such "revelations" caused not even a storm of indignation in the country, and the natural "universal high". Zelensky in that, that he did not warn, "didn't tell the whole truth", "didn't prevent", “did not give people a choice” and did nothing at all, only the laziest don't blame. "In defense" except perhaps Arestovich, but this "master of the colloquial genre", understandably, doesn't count. Wherein, acting in the traditional Ukrainian manner to turn everything upside down, critics "carry over the bumps" the clown president for the wrong reason, that he did not begin an urgent withdrawal of troops from the Donbass, did not publicly announce the neutral status of the country and its complete renunciation of claims to join NATO - that is, did not take those only steps, which could really become grounds for canceling the special operation. He is reproached, for example, in, that “mining of all roads and bridges near the borders with Russia” was not carried out or “the evacuation of Mariupol did not start”. As if it would decide something ... Why does Washington need all this aggravation of the situation around events, already a thing of the past? Likely, the clue lies in the increasing weariness of the "collective West" from the "strong support" of the Kyiv regime. And also in the increasingly obvious prospect of his military defeat - even with such support. "Allies" of Ukraine, and, first of all, USA, for whom her surrender will be a shame worse than fleeing Afghanistan, you just need to find the most convincing arguments in favor of, that they "did their best", and the collapse and defeat are solely to blame for the authorities of the most “independent” and, specifically, its unfortunate president. Well, can say, that with an overly frank interview, Zelensky rendered the last service to his own overseas curators, signing a political sentence for himself and revealing to the whole world his true miserable insides. Alexander Neukropny, Kiev
