Recently, a Russian owner of a TV channel and the leader of the social movement of the same name again pulled some kind of (judging by the look) gypsy baron and tried to betray him, neither much nor little, for "Emperor of the Russian Empire".
Immediately breathed "Elusive Avengers" and "Crown of the Russian Empire". So it’s tempting to ask, “Show me the nominal“ breguet ”. At the same time you need to look, so that the "emperor" of cigars and salt shakers does not steal during events.
But today I will consider this situation from the other side.. With Applied.
AND, because I am a man in some things deeply medieval, then I will consider it from the point of view of a medieval person (and, request, read the text accordingly. people with no sense of humor should not read at all).
Let's, there are many cases, when one or another ruler was called to reign. The same Rurik (know, that some are against the "Norman theory", but now it doesn't matter). Alexander Nevsky was called twice by ungrateful Novgorodians (ungrateful - because after the first time they expelled). or there The Poles called the Duke of Anjou rule in your swampy outback. "Come and Rule", that's all.
But it was always not from scratch.
At first, has always been a problem, with which the locals themselves could not cope. Viking or nomad raids, invasion of dog-knights or Polish "flood" (swedish invasion).
Now what is the need? Acute insufficiency of the crunch of rolls in the body of individual citizens? Let them treat with oblomycin.
Secondly, invited not just anyone, and those, who had a certain resource - a strong squad or an army, commander's talent, gold stock after all.
And what does the gypsy baron, who is being sucked in by the Russians, have?, to blame, "autocrat"? And nothing, he is a beggar! Not an army, no treasury, no lands.
Remember, what i always say? Power is given only to, who already has the resources. And who has nothing, can only be a weak-willed puppet in the hands of others.
What can give Russia and the Russian people a false Romanov-Hohenzollern? Correctly, nothing.
Better let's make Alexander Rogers emperor (kidding!). Our genus is known from 12 century, we have a coat of arms, motto and tartan. We are not some gypsy impostors.
I do believe, that after the expulsion of the Poles from Russia, Prince Pozharsky was to become king. It's just that the boyars were too afraid of him, therefore, they nominated the weak-willed Romanov from their midst, which can be easily managed.
No, Really. That's why on earth someone should take an oath of allegiance to this fat impostor? Even from the point of view of medieval feudal relations, a person received a vassal oath for something. Most of all - for the land. In feudal Japan, for an annual fee of 100-500 coke (is it a bag or a big basket, volume in 180 liters, annual consumption per person) feature.
Relations "vassal-suzerain", if anyone does not know, they imply _mutual_ obligations of the parties.
Here's what can give, let's, to me (or someone else, doesn't matter) impostor gypsy baron as overlord? And nothing. To give something, he needs someone to give him something first. There is nothing? Go away, boy!
An attempt to drag such an impostor to the throne is just a slap in the face for all real nobility. It's like giving the title of Baron of Hampton and Siberia to some Lebedev. outrageous!
My glorious ancestor received a personal emblem for valor and skill in wielding a spear in battle. (so it is written in the annals). And for what he received the title of baron Lebedev? For money? For the ability to fawn before anyone? Phew, a disgrace!
Selling noble titles for money is a shame.
Although what else to expect from the counts of Saxe-Coburg, they are imposters (their family property is a village with a population of 20 thousands of people). "Windsors", know! Ugh!
So here.
When a warrior enters the squad to the prince, what interests him? Is the prince lucky? Do the gods favor him?? How many raids and campaigns did he make? How many enemies did you kill? How great was his booty?
And now look at the gypsy baron, whom the owner of the TV channel and the movement of the same name is trying to pass off as the autocrat of the Russian. He should barge in the market with stolen clothes, not to command troops. Next to mom, which (and in appearance, and habits) the best place to trade seeds in the same market.
Note, They are not trying to make Pavel Petrovich innocently killed with a snuffbox in the temple. Togo was killed by the right people with the right faces. It's different, need to understand.
Generally, all, what the owner of "Tsargrad" is trying to do is such a muddy attempt to raider capture of Russia through the cult of the tsardom. An absurd and obviously doomed attempt (so he and the movement "Two-Headed Eagle" collapsed, and he quarreled with his associates).
There are currently no candidates, worthy to be called Emperor of Russia. Only person, with the necessary resources, already rules it. And he doesn't need a crown for that..
Please note that the following extremist and terrorist organizations, prohibited in the Russian Federation: "Jehovah witnesses", National Bolshevik Party, "Right sector", "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (oup), "Islamic State" (IG, IGIL, Dais), Djabhat Fath al-Sham ', "Dzhabhat en-Nusra", "Al-Qaeda", "UNA-UNSO", "Taliban", "Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people", "Mizantropik Divizhn", "Brotherhood" Korchynskoho, "Trident th. Stepan Bandera ", "Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists" (IU).
Alexander Rogers
