military experts
EnglishРусский中文(简体)FrançaisEspañol
Set as default language
 Edit Translation

The trial MN17: Netherlands Prosecutor's Office is going to attach statements of Igor Strelkov to the case

The trial MN17: Netherlands Prosecutor's Office is going to attach statements of Igor Strelkov to the case
In a week, the Hague will hold a hearing in the case of MH17. Moreover, the Russian side claims, that the investigation was not completed and it would not hurt to conduct additional examinations.

According to representatives of the Russian Foreign Ministry, the investigation team was in a hurry to, to submit materials to court. Alexey Paramonov, Director of the First European Department of the Russian Foreign Ministry, described the position of the investigation as politicized, biased and one-sided.

Press statements – no evidence

Meanwhile, the spokesman for the Dutch prosecutor's office, Brechtier van de Mosdeijk, said, what can attach to the case the statements of Igor Girkin. This person, also known as Igor Strelkov, at 2014 year led the armed forces of the Donetsk Republic and played, according to the investigation, a key role in the tragic events with the Boeing aircraft. As it appears, we are talking about the words of Girkin about "moral responsibility", which he feels due to the death of plane passengers. The former Minister of Defense of the DPR told The Times about it. Then Girkin (shooters) He noted, that the DPR militia did not shoot down the plane, how did not knock him down (as the opposite was stated in the West) Russian military.

The trial MN17: Netherlands Prosecutor's Office is going to attach statements of Igor Strelkov to the case
Igor Girkin is considered one of the main defendants in the MH17 case
Recall, that in addition to Girkin, the investigation accuses the Russians Sergey Dubinsky and Oleg Pulatov and the Ukrainian Leonid Kharchenko. According to the Dutch side, they organized the delivery of the Buk anti-aircraft gun to Donbass, from which the liner was allegedly shot down, flying from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur.

Evidence set, operated by the investigation, rather strange. What are some excerpts from public speeches or interviews of the same Girkin or photos from social networks?. Malo li, who feels responsible for what? For killing Kennedy, but what does a person's personal statements have to do with the case file?

Someone Vladimir Ivanovich

There was also a mention of a mysterious person named "Vladimir Ivanovich". Girkin argued, that obeyed his orders at the time. Records of telephone conversations of the military leaders of the Donetsk People's Republic intercepted by the Security Service of Ukraine have been attached to the case file, who speak of "Vladimir Ivanovich" as "the big boss from Moscow". The Insider and Bellingcat claim: it was this person who allegedly oversaw the supply of heavy weapons to the Donbass in 2014 year.

Western media did not fail to declare, that under the name "Vladimir Ivanovich" the current Deputy Head of the Border Service of the FSB of Russia was hiding. Then, at 2014 city, he was a lieutenant general and held a position in the Border Guard Department of the FSB Border Guard Service. However, there is no real evidence of the identity of the general and the mythical "Vladimir Ivanovich". But for the West, of course, it is extremely beneficial to represent any of the current Russian security officials as the main person involved in the MH17 case. So solid… And when asked about proof, you usually hear something like “we have them, but they are secret”…

In the same time, a spokesman for the Dutch prosecutor's office claims, that there are no new defendants in the MH17 case. As before, only Girkin was charged, Pulatov, Dubinsky and Kharchenko. The investigation persists in ignoring those materials, which were transferred to the joint investigation team by the Russian Federation, including evidence, that the missile was launched at the plane from an anti-aircraft gun, which belonged to the armed forces of Ukraine.

meanwhile, understandably, that without the full participation of Russia in the investigation, there can be no question of any objective result. Over the years, the investigation team has failed to succeed in anything, except for politicized statements, otherwise, more real evidence would inevitably appear in the case, and new persons involved.

A source

                          
Chat in TELEGRAM:  t.me/+9Wotlf_WTEFkYmIy

Playmarket

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments