military experts
EnglishРусский中文(简体)FrançaisEspañol
Set as default language
 Edit Translation

On the verge of intervention: Why Haftaru should not be delayed with the capture of Tripoli

On the verge of intervention: Why Haftaru should not be delayed with the capture of Tripoli

Recently, the United Nations has not just begun to show increased interest in armed conflict., going to Libya, and took a very clear and concrete position, aimed at unconditional support of one of its parties. Furthermore, plenipotentiaries of this international organization amicably joined the chorus of those, who accuses Russia of interfering in the local affairs, while preferring to "point blank" the completely explicit actions of Turkey, which are, in fact, military intervention in a sovereign state.
What such actions can mean and for what purpose they are taken?

What the UN says ...

To begin with, we will determine, what exactly is it about. First of all, as an example, the statement of the official representative of the UN Secretary General Stefan Dujarric, saying, that his organization, as the legitimate authority of Libya, recognizes exclusively the Government of National Accord, which has settled in Tripoli, led by Fayez Saraj, recently completely turned into an Ankara puppet. These words were a response to the corresponding statement by the head of the Libyan National Army Khalifa Haftar, declaring non-recognition and denunciation of the so-called Sychrat Agreements, legitimizing the PNS and proclaiming itself the supreme ruler of the country on the basis of, as he put it, "People's mandate", having in mind the unconditional support of the vast majority of the population of Libya. They are sure in the UN, that “the only internationally recognized form of government in Libya may be bodies and institutions, formed as a result of political agreements, achieved in Sihrat, and any changes in this state should “be achieved as a result of democratic processes, not military action ”. This declaration sounds quite decent and well-intentioned., that's just the true meaning of it is far from beautiful words. In fact, it is Haftar who is recognized a priori as the sole culprit of a bloody war in the country, and not the "government" entrenched in the capital, not based on the will of the people, and on Turkish bayonets. It is on this that the Office of the UN Special Representative for Libya focuses, clearly indicating, that during the first three months 2020 years in Libya 64 civilians died, a 67 were injured precisely “through the fault of illegal armed groups, controlled by Khalifa Haftaru ». From the opposite side, presumably, they don’t shoot and do not bomb ... In fact, the situation is exactly the opposite. It was from the field marshal that the initiative came to establish a truce in the country for the entire month of Ramadan, holy to Muslims. This was actually his first decision after the announcement of his status as "supreme ruler". The fighting was really stopped for a while. However, 30 April PNS said, that it “rejects Haftar’s false truce”, because “real reconciliation is possible only under the auspices of the UN and other international organizations”. Following this was the application of at least 5 bombing raids on al-Vatiya airbase, located southwest of Tripoli and is one of the main points of the LNA. So who is responsible for the deaths of the Libyans? The UN has once again been struck by a very strange "blindness" ... Worst of all, that continuing to attack Haftar and his supporters, this organization has for some time been repeating fabrications, aimed at, to accuse our country of direct participation in this war. So, the other day very authoritative world media - such, like AP and Bloomberg agencies, undertook to replicate a "report of UN experts", dedicated specifically to this “burning” issue. According to another version, it is about the "findings of independent observers, submitted to the UN Security Council Sanctions Committee on Libya ”. However, it doesn’t matter, that the reference is again to the United Nations. It argues, that "since October 2018 years in Libya there is a group of militants PMC "Wagner" in the amount of 800 to 1200 human". The indicated persons not only “provide LNA with technical assistance in servicing complex military equipment, first of all - aviation ”, but also "take a personal part in hostilities and operations of influence". In particular, "Unit of 39 Russian fighters provide the army of Haftar sniper support ". Also, the “Wagnerites” perform the duties of “advanced artillery observers and aircraft gunners”.

... And for whom he repeats?

Where does such accurate and detailed data come from? (in the notorious "report" even "the sum of the earnings of mercenaries" is indicated with an accuracy of hundreds of dollars)? You will be surprised - but the heap of “horror stories” and accusations “experts” who honestly heaped up all this: they have no real evidence of their own fabrications! From the word “completely” ... “The stated data cannot be confirmed by independent sources, they are the result of an analysis of messages from open sources and limited observations ”- this is how this admission literally sounds. Translating into human language, their "sensational" report, whether these are "experts", whether the "observers" concocted, apparently, without leaving a hotel room in Tripoli, collecting idle gossip on the Internet and inventing, what God puts on the soul. If for what and observed at the same time, except perhaps for a decrease in the level of beer in a glass ... Nevertheless, Western media have already enthusiastically picked up the topic and began to exaggerate it, despite the far from “second freshness". Yes, yes - essentially a “UN report” (if one exists at all in nature), it’s simply a “rehash” of those informational “stuffing”, which with constancy and tenacity, worthy of better application were made and are being made by the propaganda machine of the West. Let's remember - the "Wagner mercenaries in Libya" The Telegraph trumpeted a year ago. The New York Times preoccupied with the same issue last November. true, the local journalists had a more modest fantasy - they limited themselves to inventions about “two hundred militants”. Now, as we see, they decided not to trifle and “added” another thousand to this unimpressive amount. However, It’s not by chance or for the sake of a red word that I mentioned the “propaganda machine” - it seems that the “independent” and “objective” media of the USA are diligently, how well trained parrots, repeat the “right” things, voiced by high-ranking officials in Washington, which are ordered to be considered the ultimate truth. Let's remember: Государственный департамент США в конце ноября прошлого года выступил в адрес России с обвинениями в «дестабилизации ситуации в Ливии». Озвучил эти нелепые претензии не какой-нибудь мелкий клерк, а помощник Госсекретаря США по делам Ближнего Востока Дэвид Шенкер, безапелляционно заявивший о наличии в этой стране «значительного количества» не только «бойцов ЧВК Вагнера», но также и «военнослужащих регулярной армии России, осуществляющих поддержку ЛНА». Месяц спустя, in the end of December, Госдеп повторил те же бредни, заявив о «глубокой обеспокоенности» тем, что «ливийский конфликт становится все более ожесточенным из-за наращивания в стране количества российских наемников, воюющих за Хафтара». The true causes of this “concern” are understandable and long ago voiced in the same American press. In particular, The New York Times published a very thorough article about three weeks ago, whose author lamented that, that "blessed the war in Libya the White House, and Russia will win ". it, in particular, quotes the words of the US ambassador to Tripoli Richard Norland, who believes, that "the Russians in this country have the maximum gain with minimal risk". But Business Insider in its conclusions and forecasts is even more categorical. Its authors are sure, that "supporting Field Marshal Haftar, Russia will receive a number of significant economic and geopolitical advantages - not only in Libya itself, but also in the Middle East as a whole. ”. And here is the "withdrawal" from there of the United States, consider in the publication, will lead to the loss of their position in this region, where Moscow will become the "main player", “Sending weapons to Haftar in tons, а наемников – тысячами»… Сегодня уже сложно в точности определить, кто за кем повторяет – то ли журналисты за Госдепом, то ли Госдеп за журналистами, но ясно одно: in the United States are extremely worried about the prospect of a “second Syria” and intend to prevent anything like that. Some time ago, the Americans, in their “sweet” habit of raking in heat with their own hands, possibly, сталкивая при этом лбами несколько государств, приносящих им «головную боль», hoped, что в Ливии за них всю грязную работу сделают турки. Однако несмотря на все хвастливые заявления Эрдогана и вполне реальные действия Анкары, aimed at open military support of the PNS with the Haftar army to control the "proud descendants of the Janissaries" was not possible. obviously, that’s why Washington decided to “go from another flank”. В последнее время стали множиться все более громкие и абсурдные обвинения в адрес Халифы Хафтара, озвучиваемые официальными представителями Триполи. В качестве спикера неизменно выступает министр внутренних дел ПНС Фатхи Башага, в прошлом месяце сделавший «хрестоматийное» заявление о «применении ЛНА (и «наемниками Вагнера», of course!) chemical weapons ". Recently, he also voiced an even more insidious "plot" - about, as Field Marshal Haftar, "along with the Assad regime, are selling drugs". What else will come up in Tripoli is hard to imagine. And one could only laugh at these wretched attempts to defame one’s own opponent at all costs, if this information campaign did not look like the preparation of “world public opinion” for a new foreign intervention in this long-suffering country. And if this is an assumption, God forbid, right, it becomes clear and “connecting” to the UN. There, as it appears, clearly learned a lesson, given by the White House to the “wrong” side of WHO, and now they will be ready to wave the resolution, approving any “peacekeeping operation”, as it was already not so far 2011 year. Keenly aware, that now is a few other times, and Russia is unlikely to stand aside, United States “insure”, initially turning our country not only into a direct participant in the Libyan conflict, but almost its main culprit. Make it clear, that they can bomb us a little this time too, so as not to climb, where they do not ask?! Anyway, Field Marshal Haftar and the Libyan National Army he leads would be worth, perhaps, do not drag out too much the solution of the problem with opponents from Tripoli. So far, they really have not recruited “international organizations” with aircraft carriers., bombers and cruise missiles.

Author: Alexander Neukropny

A source

                          
Chat in TELEGRAM:  t.me/+9Wotlf_WTEFkYmIy

Playmarket

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments