military experts
EnglishРусский中文(简体)FrançaisEspañol
Set as default language
 Edit Translation

Hu of Mr. Putin? On the role of Putin in the history of Russia and the Putin phenomenon in international politics.

Hu of Mr. Putin? On the role of Putin in the history of Russia and the Putin phenomenon in international politics.

There's no doubt, that the most famous person on the planet in the 21st century is Vladimir Putin. Absolutely right, in the history books of all time, the first quarter of this century and will be called – “Putin era”. Let's try to understand, where the merit of Putin here, and where the usual mythologizing image, artificial injection of popularity , convenient for a lot of players in the geopolitics of our times.

I have to say, to hysterical screams underdeveloped part of RuNet, type, “Putin is a thief” or “all putinoidy bastards” I deeply spit. Odnoizvilinnyh opinion about Putin and his place in history as I know. This view is flawed, offended fate and life, prone to suggestion and propaganda, celled creatures. These molecules do not write the history of the planet, not the squalor heard by the fate of nations. I am interested in hard facts, real events, dispassionate analysis and logical conclusions.

On the biography of VV, fishing season, I think, it makes no sense to dwell. Although many of his foes often put it as a reproach to the absence of “many years' experience of administrative and organizational work”, accused in “KGB” methods of management of the whole country. All this is not serious, time “party nomenclature”, fortunately, long gone. “Potomstvennыmy leaders” and “dynasties” we, thank God, full. And we do not have yet educational institutions training staff on specialty “President”. So here it is simple, a former employee of the security services has the same right to the presidency, as, let us say, former actor and former electrician.

so, Putin to power led, can say “for lunch”, ex-president, not the night will be commemorated, Boris Nikolaevich Yeltsin. Here the interesting statement that Yeltsin himself, that the first sentence “try porukovodit country” then Putin categorically refused under the pretext of self-complete unwillingness to occupy such a post. unknown, Is it true, Love EBN “embellish” image known to all. But, howbeit, Putin is still in 2000 year stood “Chapter” the whole country.

for young, Russia 2000 of the year, This deeply hurt, standing on the brink, country. Economy, more precisely, the, that was left, to collapse. Countries are making, carrying away, what was left of the Soviet Union. Bosom, including the same oil, I belong to several oligarchs. Also, 1995 the decision was taken in Russia “The Production Sharing Agreement”, according to which Russia's largest oil and gas deposits were in foreign jurisdictions. This is the question that, how to Putin “It belonged to the people”.

Hu of Mr. Putin? On the role of Putin in the history of Russia and the Putin phenomenon in international politics.

photo from the Internet.

Iron and indisputable fact. First thing, who occupied the post of President Putin took , it was just the return of proceeds from the sale of hydrocarbons to the rightful owner, i.e, State. Those interested can find the schedules Russian oil revenues over the hill. jump up – it's coming to power of Putin. At the same time, and will kill the following fakie, they say, Coincidentally, Oil simply sharply podorazhala. so here, Putin came then, when oil was around 30 $ per barrel. But, after two years of oil fell to 20 $. but, oil revenues to the state treasury only up. Confident price growth began about 2005, i.e, when Putin has long been firmly “on his feet”, when he did not really even needed “successful conjuncture” with energy prices.

Another important milestone on the way to becoming president mododogo. This Chechen events, This whole series of terrorist acts, committed on the territories of Russia are far from “battlefields”, even in the capital itself. current ( Yes, and also the then) Putin foes actively mussyruyutsya (exaggerated) rumors about the involvement of GDP for these acts of terrorism, even, the organization of these crimes. In this delirium can only believe it is absolutely moronic people. Even, if you leave aside the moral aspect. There is no logic in this statement, for it is in these days of armchair under Putin it move so, more than ever . Count, Putin himself podstvail under attack – this, gentlemen, level , what is called, “the floor”.

However, just look at spsiok Posters Putin's prosecutors ” in the organization of terrorist attacks”. For example :

Hu of Mr. Putin? On the role of Putin in the history of Russia and the Putin phenomenon in international politics.

Hu of Mr. Putin? On the role of Putin in the history of Russia and the Putin phenomenon in international politics.

Need more comments? As soon as I saw the west “melting in the mist” revenues from oil roosiyskoy, once sensed, that the new “steering Russia” It will not be a copy of the previous, default recognizes the supremacy of the West. So immediately thundered volleys from all trunks advocacy artilerii. Today iformatsionnaya war against Russia did not begin in 2013 year, It began at a time. West not hotel, I could not accept the loss of, it would seem, now fully “extracted trophy”, prize imaginary victory in the Cold War. Russia in the eyes swam out of the hands, “the civilized world” raged.

Needless to say, that here, in Russia was “raised in the gun” All large army “grant eaters” and “pechenkolyubov”? All these “Kohi-nemtsovs Politkovskaya”, all this innumerable army, royaschayasya near “hive-breadwinner” US Embassy also blazing with righteous anger over “inhuman Chekist”, sacrificing thousands “innocent people” to serve their “political ambitions”.

The final cross on Putin, as obedient to the West “dolls” I put the so-called, “Munich speech” VV. fishing season. Masks have been completely reset, unipolar world has been sentenced. If someone in the West still had illusions about modern Russia, it was after Munich 2007 , all fell into place.

Events in Ukraine 2014 of the year, Crimea and the Donbass. Nveroyatnoe, At first glance,, developments in Syria and Venezuela. All this put a fat point in question. Who “the shots ” on the ground. No doubt could no longer remain, Putin is the most authoritative and influential man in the world. Our impoverished to outstanding personalities of the world sobschestvo, finally, He acquired his idol. Putin was needed all, and enemies, and friends. And then he appeared.

Hu of Mr. Putin? On the role of Putin in the history of Russia and the Putin phenomenon in international politics.

a collage of internet.

by the way, there should definitely be noted. Putin, like no one else, very friendly policies and to “not very friendly”, so to speak, Political circles of the world. If it were not for this Putin, it would have had to invent. For example, problems brekzitom cornered relationship between Theresa May and the British Parliament? We need some sort of “dormer”, “lifesaver”? Yes, here it is, Putin, He is to blame.

US political elite “heap in Trump”? all hope, all hope in Clinton's pants in the toilet? intervened, without a doubt, all he is. Omnipresent and omnipotent “Putin”. Now Western politicians and leaders became possible to write off all of their “shoals”. All your neprofessinalizm, inability to work in the new political realities. All this plausible excuse and explanation was found. it “he”, this “chyekist kgbeshnik”, this “evil genius” , “spider, enmeshed in a web of his entire globe”.

In other words. The lion's share in the creation of Putin's popularity, mythologizing of his authority and power, it is a merit of his “nedruhov-of partner”. “The most influential Putin” – It is the fruit of clock, artificial “demonization” image. Here, as the saying goes, “what fighting, for it and ran”.

Hu of Mr. Putin? On the role of Putin in the history of Russia and the Putin phenomenon in international politics.

a collage of internet.

So, Putin's role in the outside, in the world, so to speak, scale, we all clear. Yes – avtortet, Yes – lump, Yes – chelovechische. Well, we then, within, in Russia, heat or cold from the international success of Putin's personality? How do we relate to the activities of Vladimr Vladimirovich the post of general manager of our?

Here I must say, the situation is more, than an ambiguous. country ( it is my personal feeling, with them it is possible to argue) clearly divided into two opposing camps. One part, actually, worships Putin, praises to the skies all his actions. In principle not to notice mistakes or flaws, He refuses to even suggest, what “the God” may make a blunder.

And the second part, in my opinion, more smallest, but, extremely active in interente, why the illusion is created “mass” this movement. These are the, Who “hard hates” fishing season. Who in any of his words or actions can only see the negative, who is on the level of reflex rejects all positive, that comes from the current president.

here it is obvious, it is necessary to identify the subset of those “primitive organisms”, they are looking for in Putin what that physical explicit or imaginary shortcomings and try to focus on these physical qualities of Putin. All this debility ” botoksny”, “dwarf”,”pleshivыy”. It is this level of, that are at the bottom. It is a natural cretinism, only the latter can evaluate the activities of the down poltitka or leader on the basis of its external data. With these amoebas discussion is impossible in principle.

so here, and the, and others can. And even need to be reminded of a quote is not the stupidest person:

Hu of Mr. Putin? On the role of Putin in the history of Russia and the Putin phenomenon in international politics.

As a result. In my opinion, Today the most reasonable for us, for Russian citizens , it would avoid extreme assessments of Mr Putin's performance as president of Russia. We are not Western politicians, We shrill hysteria can not bring any dividends. And stupid, too, praise is not a method. We need a sober, balanced assessment. almost certainly, This objective assessment of today can not be determined. We Putin's contemporaries, we feel his work each in his place in the social ladder. because, I think, extremely foolish desire each other's throats because of the differences in the assessment of Putin's work. We must be calm, the time necessary to explain everything. More important for us to keep the country, than “nail” Putin or the pillory, or “hang a picture of him on the board of honor” .

A source

                          
Chat in TELEGRAM:  t.me/+9Wotlf_WTEFkYmIy

Playmarket

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 A comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
anonym
anonym
1 year ago

Everything is right. The only thing, what can be added, this is that our President is the only person after Lenin, the cat has a higher university legal education and heads the country of Russia! All predecessors since Khrushchev are solid Sancho Panza, by chance came to the pinnacle of power. And if not for the fifth callon, life would have been different. I think it's the will of Providence, that we have such a person as V.V.. Putin. God help Vladimir Vladimirovich!