Russian experts have called these arguments "pro-American an injection of"
A lot of noise in the foreign media have done a video footage of the first flight of the Russian heavy impact drone C-70 "Hunter". this entry 7 of August on its channel in Youtube laid out the Russian Defense Ministry, after which the foreign expert online community erupted fierce criticism: they say, This new device - a major setback Russian. How was their impact drone issue, and remained.
More than anyone in this topic, surprisingly, made fun of the Chinese media. Ridiculing the flight of Russian drone, Blogosphere experts from China have emphasized, that trying vyponit this apparatus on a "flying wing" with a small radar signature technology (stealth), Russian developers, allegedly, They failed to make it invisible to enemy radar.
Chinese portal «SINA» one of the military experts, arguing about, directly and says: they say, Drone on the surface there are too many holes. They are needed for normal operation of the jet engine of this machine. But with so many air intakes, drone is just a "glow" on radar screens, It is turning into a huge goal convenient for destruction. So what about any stealth technology here, allegedly, can not speak.
the, that the "Hunter" – a huge machine, it's true. Swipe its wing 19 m, and weight - about 20 tonnes. Fly such a large object should be in the range of more than 5000 kilometers. But as cloaking device, Russian experts then enter into a dispute with the Chinese experts.
So leading expert on aviation unmanned systems Denis Fedutinov, Asked to comment on the opinion of Chinese bloggers regarding our impact drone C-70 "Hunter", He spoke clearly and sharply:
-Posts in social networks, so-called, "Experts", reasoning about "a large number of holes" and "protruding antennas everywhere" in the experimental apparatus, hardly deserve serious comment. They speak for themselves, showing the level of "expertise", pro who usually speak: "Through the floor".
Another leading Russian military expert Alexei Leonkov trying to "MK" to find out how much justified criticism of the Russian news Chinese experts, He spoke in more detail. he explained:
-This criticism is very similar to the conscious stuffing. The thing is, that under the Chinese media is often masked by "comrades" from overseas. using the, the Chinese Taiwan is almost pro-American, they pour out all this murk. That throws all sorts of nonsense about the Russian S-400, something about our aircraft 5th generation, in the field of advanced arms about other successful Russian projects.
As to the merits of the matter, these findings about all kinds of holes and their number, obviously not sound Chinese. They are such nuances do not know: what's the forms must be correct or not correct slots. These guys are committed to, usually all in all copy, and then to learn, that it was copied. So that such criticism does not sound in Chinese, but very American.
Only these critics do not take into account, that the "Hunter", that is, with all the nozzles there stealth without protection now flies, it's just a - a prototype, which practiced some elements of the future drone. Now, in particular, flight program. clear, that he will eventually be modified. I authoritatively declare to you: the unit will be different. completely. Now just need to check the engine, check aerobatic properties, automation, to see how such a heavy drone can autonomously fly long distances. All this can be verified only an experimental, rather than some theoretical calculations there. To do this, the basis for yet taken definite form unit. At this stage, nobody put the problem, immediately perform its embodiment in stealth.
Think about it: done, for example, prototype stealth sample, which is much more expensive than a simple sample, and during the test, he falls and breaks. You know how much it will cost? I keep quiet, so as not to frighten the sums. So that, us these "experts" offer money squandered?
That's why we have so far and flies only Prototype. And "sneak up" to this unit with a ruler and excessive demands, that at this stage it is not yet necessary, not worth it. stealth technology will be practiced on it at the next stage. In addition, these technologies have their own, not as, as the Americans. We do not even call the stealth technology, since we are based on completely different principles. So let all these "experts-wishers" will break the head until and pozloradstvuyut. Then they have to wonder greatly, when they see, what we have achieved on this machine.
Olga Bozhyev
