1. introduction
Bellingcat's latest report released, dedicated persons, involved in the destruction of the airliner “Malaysian Airlines” flight MN-17. The evidence is given by, allegedly obtained from open sources and generalized into a single material.
Bellingcat in its investigations, despite obvious falsified material and ambiguous arguments, designed for the layman, refer to their past publications.
Although it has already been proven, that Bellingcat material is a good fake, and the texts were written by a specialist psychologist, who tries to manipulate the reader and wishful thinking. The main goal of Bellingcat's authors is obvious - to form public opinion about Russia's involvement in the catastrophe and convince the Joint Investigation Team of this.
In the next “opus” Bellingcat pseudo-followers claim, what installation “beech” allegedly Russian is a proven fact, which was accepted by the Joint Investigation Team, and this question is closed by them. Now they have set the task of finding the perpetrators from the Russian side, without thinking much and not paying attention to the obvious inconsistencies in their published materials about belonging “beech”.
2. Objective data
Once again I need to remind, that evidence can only be reliable and must be based on objective facts, and not on the speculation of "fashion bloggers" and a biased SSG.
At first, concern “Almaz-Antey” (complex developer “beech”!) an unprecedented field experiment was carried out with the detonation of a combat missile “beech” and the corresponding mathematical calculations, which in practice showed the fallacy of the JIT's conclusions about, the rocket, that hit the Malaysian Boeing is in service only with the Russian Armed Forces and was launched from the Snezhnoye area.
Experiments “Almaz-Anthea” left no doubt - the Boeing was shot down by a 9M38 anti-aircraft missile, which is not produced in the Russian Federation since 1986 years and was removed from service by the Russian armed forces back in 2011 year. The option of hitting Boeing with a more modern 9M38M1 missile was ruled out, since this type of ammunition leaves characteristic damage on the body in the form “butterflies”, not found on a Malaysian plane.
In the study of the affected area of the aircraft body and carrying out mathematical calculations, the conclusion, that the rocket was launched from the territory, controlled APU, that is, from the Zaroshchensky area.
Briefing of the Concern Almaz-Antey on the results of the experiment
The data from this experiment were presented to the investigation team and the general public., but the Dutch ignored his results.
Secondly, in September 2016 a briefing, during which the representative of the Ministry of Defense and the deputy chief designer of the radar complex “Utes-T” brought to the public the primary radar data.
The technical characteristics of the radar when launching a rocket from Snezhnoye make it possible to record its flight and trajectory. In the case of the Boeing crash, the radar flight of the object, classified as a rocket, did not fix.
This refutes Bellingcat's claim, the Ukrainian side and the findings of the Dutch investigators that, that the rocket was launched from the area, militia-controlled.
Briefing of the Russian Ministry of Defense with a demonstration of primary radar data
Furthermore, at the request of the JIT, the Russian side provided it with the primary data of the Rostov radar “Utes-T”. But the Dutch persist in blaming Russia, and to the question, what about the information provided by the Russian side, answer evasively - while analyzing.
In addition to Russia, Ukraine also has information about the air situation.. That fact, what “independent” has not yet released data from its radars, exercising control over the airspace over Donbass, suggests, that the missile launch site was on the territory controlled by the Armed Forces of Ukraine and this is carefully hidden.
Thirdly, when the JCC published parts of the 9M38 rocket from the installation found near the Boeing crash site “beech” Is the engine and the nozzle, with serial numbers, Russian Defense Ministry has shown irrefutable evidence, that the rocket was UKRAINIAN.
The Russian Ministry of Defense took an unprecedented step, by declassifying the documents of the manufacturer with the stamp "top secret".
Fragment of the presentation of the briefing by the Russian Ministry of Defense on the results of the identification of the Buk missile
Based on these documents it was possible to establish, that the engine and nozzle were delivered to the factory product 9M38 with a serial number 8868720, where is the first 8 Is the company code, 86 - Year of manufacture, a 8720 - factory serial number. The rocket was assembled 24 December 1986 of the year, received an onboard (combat) number 886847379, and after all 5 days, 29 December, she was sent by rail to the military unit 20152, where she was accepted for supply at the beginning 1987 of the year.
Military Unit 20152 at that time was the 223rd anti-aircraft missile brigade of the Carpathian military district, stationed near Ternopil.
Further, this brigade was reorganized into the 223rd anti-aircraft missile regiment, which was relocated to the area of the city of Stryi, Lviv region. And in 2014 year this regiment took part in the civil war in Donbass.
And it has also been proven, that in no way did this missile hit and could not get into the territory of Russia.
3. Pseudo-investigation
In turn, JIT investigators on the eve of the fifth anniversary of the Boeing MH-17 disaster, sticking to my version, were forced to give some kind of explanation, that Russia and pro-Russian forces are to blame for the plane crash. Therefore, they adjusted and continue to adjust the results of the investigation to the existing anti-Russian position of Western countries..
For this are used “inferences” Bellingcat groups, not concrete evidence, presented by the Russian side at official briefings.
19 June 2019 years at the JIT briefing decided to do without “evidence” - because, the more they represent “facts”, the more questions arise for the investigation.
realizing, that it's better to keep quiet about the Ukrainian missile, the Dutch decided to limit themselves to simply statements and recordings “intercepted by the SBU” telephone conversations.
They devoted most of the briefing to the story of the close relationship between the militia and Russia., which, in principle, no one denies. There was no evidence that the militia had a MOTIVE to shoot down a civilian plane., although the Dutch prosecutor's office classifies the case as an intentional crime, not random.
Joint Investigation Team briefing 19 July 2019 g.
The most interesting, that this time the JIT officials did not voice outright fakes of the Bellingcat group, which were presented in their report. for example, recordings of negotiations of some Cossacks from Chernukhino, who claimed, that the plane was shot down. A well-known fact, that at that time the Cossacks had only small arms and guarded checkpoints.
Not a word was heard at the briefing about the Ukrainian missile. When asked by journalists, explain, how this information is used in the investigation, only vague explanations about the analysis of materials followed. This is also an indicator of the competence of the JIT and its commitment.. Data provided by Russia at the request of the JIT, were once again ignored.
The question of a Russian journalist about the presence of an air defense system “beech” in service with the Ukrainian armed forces and the presence of such equipment in the conflict zone caused obvious confusion among the speakers. Answering the above question, W. Paulsen stated, that data and information, provided by Russia, accepted for study. At the same time, the investigators complained, that the information given to them is not enough.
If Russian data is not enough, take Ukrainian or American ones - or no one wants to transmit them, because then the version of the investigation about the Russian trace will crumble to dust. “MH17 investigation does not have data from American satellites”, – here is the statement at the last briefing by the representative of the JIT.
I.e, this is another fake USA in this case, when they claimed, that there are satellite images proving Russia's involvement.
There are still a lot of questions to the Ukrainian side. What did the two divisions do, active Ukrainian “Bukov” on the line of contact in July 2014 of the year?
Why the primary data from the Ukrainian radars at the time of the disaster have not yet been presented?
Fragment of the program "Hour H", demonstrating the presence of Ukrainian complexes “beech” in the ATO zone
Also why there is no evidence from dispatcher Anna Petrenko, which conducted this flight? known, that immediately after the tragedy, she was in the company of employees of the Security Service of Ukraine for more than two hours.
Now about Ukrainian motives to hide the truth:
– Ukrainian dispatcher drove a Malaysian Boeing through the war zone;
– Ukrainian special services hide records of dispatcher's conversations;
– work of Ukrainian “Bukov” around Donetsk;
the Ukrainian authorities, under the pretext of ensuring security, prohibited the representatives of the Netherlands and Malaysia from going to the Boeing crash area immediately after the crash.
What should I say, the Dutch even removed Malaysia from the investigation. This immediately suggests that the investigation was falsified.. Malaysia was removed, and Ukraine, which did not close the airspace in the zone of armed conflict, although she was obliged to do this in accordance with the Chicago Convention 1944 city, is still a full member of the JIT. There is a clear falsification of the results of the investigation.
And this was confirmed by the Prime Minister of Malaysia M. Mohamad, who did not agree with the conclusions of the investigation, pointed out his involvement and the fulfillment of the JIT's political order.
The result of the JIT's five-year work is the replication of fakes and speculation, persecution of people on far-fetched reasons.
Even Bellingcat has to admit in its next report, that the intercepted phone calls, published by the SBU, shouldn't be trusted without verification. And you can't really trust the SBU itself, if you remember her world shame, associated with the staging of the murder of journalist A. Babchenko and the accusation of this in Russia.
Fragment of the SBU press conference on the results of the special operation “of murder” А.Бабченко
But Bellingcat needs to work off the money of the Western intelligence community, therefore, in their report on key positions, they do not hesitate to outright falsifications.
4. Bellingcat employees - there are no ex-spies
Bellingcat formed in Britain 15 July 2014 of the year, that is, two days before the crash of flight MH-17. Coincidence or not?
Elliot Higgins
Members and employees of the blogging group identified. Here is a list of Bellingcat's main representatives:
Elliot Higgins - Founder and CEO of Bellingcat. Collaborated with a non-governmental organization (NGO), which was accused of financing terrorists and trying to organize the sale of Syrian oil from the occupied territories.
Arik Toler - worked in the intelligence department of Bank of America Merrill Lynch, expert in Russian-Ukrainian relations.
Cameron Kohun - Senior Analyst at UK Government Communications Center, associated with British intelligence, in addition, he is a consultant to Livermore National Laboratory, the main task of which is the development of nuclear weapons.
Nick Waters - Retired British Forces Officer, studied in London;
Dan Kasschet - specialist in the field of weapons of mass destruction, lieutenant, U.S. Army Reserve, affiliated with the Estonian-American National Council. Intern at the U.S. Department of Defense Secretariat.
Chris Biggers - Military and Political Analyst at the Hudson Institute (USA).
Justin Seitz - employee of a Washington NGO, specializing in security issues and working closely with US law enforcement agencies.
Alberto Fitarelli - head of the strategic intelligence group.
Members of the K. Tribert group, K. Kohun and N. Waters studied at King's College London, part of the training structure for British military intelligence.
To carry out such information work, a lot of financial support is needed.. Bellingcat has many sources of cash flow.
Bloggers' customers and main sponsors are pro-government organizations, state bodies and special services of countries, leading anti-Russian policies.
So, Bellingcat is supported by the US Department of State, UK Department of Defense, the administrations of the Netherlands and Germany, National Endowment for Democracy, Atlantic Council to NATO, UNESCO, Google, Facebook, Center for Research on Corruption and Organized Crime, The MacArthur Foundation, European Center for Journalism and others.
In this way, multimillion sums, allocated to the publication, go to distort the truth and publish defamatory facts.
Bellingcat Group Funding Scheme
Bellingcat - organization, consisting of intelligence officers from different countries, the purpose of which is to discredit Russia and its actions in the foreign policy arena. Besides, the group of these pseudo-investigators is not independent, as funded by various Western and European anti-Russian organizations.
In this way, the West's interest in blaming Russia for the tragedy is confirmed.
For this, blogging groups are specially created., intelligence officers, willing to work on falsifying evidence, allegedly taken from open sources. Besides, an international investigation is organized from representatives of only interested countries, whose opinion will coincide with the anti-Russian rhetoric of the United States and Great Britain.
