If three of the scandal, with a similar focus, occur one after the other in one small time interval, unwittingly it seems, that their is something unites.
Or someone brings together. maybe, within these scandals are not formally involved.
At first, 7 July, journalist Gabunia poured out a stream of obscene insults to the president of Russia.
Then, 9 July, editor of Die Welt newspaper announced Kellerhoff German tank battle in Prokhorovka field in summer 1943 g. not to have been demanded and immediately demolish the monument to the dead in this battle Soviet soldiers, the soldiers of the Red Army.
after, 12 July, "On the historical memory of the Presidential Council on Human Rights Commission (SPCH)», declared inadmissible the installation in the national territory of the Russian Federation of the monument to Stalin, who led the country in those years, and the high command of the armed forces. The Commission announced the establishment of similar monuments excuse political repression and the "mockery of the memory of victims of the past century". At the same time severely threatened "irresponsible civil servants", "Do not understand the public policy": "Government officials at all levels must clearly know about the inadmissibility of the use for this state or municipal land and buildings. Such actions are not only contrary to morality, respect for our deceased, innocent victims ancestors, but also the official state policy ".
Strictly speaking, tone also recalls the warning of impending repression for "irresponsible".
Scandalous leading from Georgian nationalists controlled newspaper offends the President of Russia. Ultimately, it is for, that he obstinately pursues a policy of protection of national interests of Russia.
Editor of the German newspaper scandalous require demolition of the monument to the soldiers, with their lives stopped the Nazis and liberated from it and Europe, and Germany itself.
Personality of the "Commission for the historical memory of the Presidential Council on Human Rights (SPCH)"Forbid its citizens and its officials to establish monuments to man, led the country at that time and in the struggle against Nazism. Ultimately, because, that he does not like them. For different reasons. And I worked hard, and others made, and results in contrast,, samoprovozglashennыh "chlenkipov», able to achieve. And they do not like, what 70% citizens for some reason he likes, and they, third of a century say not from high tribunes, what it was awful, these citizens do not like.
And all three information-psychological attack - both on schedule: strictly at regular intervals. Formally - for different reasons. Really - memory and dignity of the country.
From personal Gabunia through Germany to "Gabunia Collective". "Gabunia-Germany-Gabunia Collective".
The question in this case is not about Stalin: if a - 70% citizens assess its role positively, it is not the members of this "historical memory of the commission", indicate that citizens nor how to evaluate this or that historical figure, or where they may establish a monument to, whom.
And not even in his monument - disputes, has long boring and repetitive, the old record: arguments are the same. heart, generally, one: if citizens in a particular city or region will be against the monument - and the aforementioned Commission statement too. And if you are over - it is harmful: has equal place, only show all, what about the opinion of the "Commission".
It's not about Stalin, and not repression - is, that country and citizens series of point information pricks solution poured information with one semantic content - and get used to memorize: "The President of your bastard, to respect that and keep up appearances op with respect to which - no. Your great victory - the myths and fictions, they were not, any field Prokhorovsky, or near Moscow, or at Stalingrad, nor in Berlin - anywhere, and monuments to put your soldiers are not allowed, a. they, who stand, should immediately carry. And if the soldiers are not worthy of monuments, a victory invented, then your supreme lavnokomanduyuschemu and leader of the country and does not need to put them, because he is not a leader and not a winner, a tyrant and a villain. And remember firmly and forever: you have nothing, rights no matter what do not have, and have a duty to serve the new masters of the world ".
Among other things, the aforementioned formula "of historical memory of the Commission" on, where you can put monuments to Stalin, and where not, For some strange comparison extremely reminiscent of the current Kiev "Law on Language": which in Russian can not speak: in official places and public institutions, and where you can: at home and in private life. And a monument to Stalin: on public lands can not be, in private - can.
Impression, that the members of this commission Stalin - that Russian Nazis Ukrainian Putin or herself to the Nazis Russian Transcaucasian.
Among other things, the two side-issue at all there: Why in the Human Rights Council - and so do not have too much respect for shocking some of its member countries personalities - "Commission for Historical Memory" ...
That's why there is the Commission on Social Rights, civil liberties and civic engagement, environmental rights, on civic participation in legal reform, on public participation in combating corruption, Economic rights and freedoms, etc.. - relatively clear: have the right to defend. Why on historical memory - seems, only to have something to occupy a status of its members.
Or claim to notoriety Institute of National Remembrance in Ukraine and Poland, much like leading the fight against the Soviet era monuments. Only there are engaged in today's Nazis, openly admitted their continuity with their national heroes of 1930-40-ies.
Here: notorious "liberals, human rights activists," the old anti-Russian hardening, repeatedly expressed his sympathy to the present who the Nazis in Ukraine, who are relevant to the demolition of monuments in Poland, etc.. Repeatedly opposed the reunification of the Crimea, in support of the Swamp area 2012 of the year, in defense of certain terrorists, requiring the Russian recognition of the rules and regulations, she trying to dictate its "geopolitical competitors' and hate at least the Soviet period of Russian history, and often the rest of the: Svanidze and Fedotov, Karaganov and Resnick, One member of the "Memorial" and a columnist for "Novaya Gazeta", a "director of the museum of history of the Gulag and one representative of the" Butovo ". And yet ...
And Igor Yurgens, Chairman of the Board of the Institute of Contemporary Development (INSOR), bravely and obstinately all 2011 h tverdyvshyy, that in no case should not be allowed to return to the post of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Because if such a, unfortunately happen suddenly, the country can expect massive riots, hunger, civil war and everything else, than you frighten society. I wrote a report for presentation, He urged and struggled: anyone, not only Putin. Better - Medvedev. or Chubais.
full circle. It began with his mother to Putin George Gabunia, I finish making all, that is possible to prevent the return of Putin to the presidency Russia Yuri Jurgens. From personal Gabunia - to "Gabunia Collective".
And all in a coordinated manner: with a clear gap every three days.
Although, of course, understandably, that if such a "Gabunia Collective", composed of the choicest of Moscow "and kvaziliberalov psevdopravozaschitnikov" would prohibit erect monuments to Stalin as, the more people there will be a desire to put them. And yet - to call on the support of someone like Beria. Because the friendly company, calling itself "on the historical memory of the Commission", such, that every sane person, when you look at their names and faces there is one desire - to do exactly the opposite of what, what they call.
because, properly, Stalin is once again popular, that curse him they. Because they, law of the country and to break it in 90 years, in fact so outraged then over the country and its policies have destroyed so many people in the country, that long ago should have shut up and if anything to say, only to repent and humbly ask for forgiveness.
And if Stalin shot of ... That, probably, not by chance.
