This is the – frank and direct Russian response to the West!
…Did, Yankees are very fond of the formula: “Clear and present danger” – “Clear and Present Danger”. Even Hollywood is one of his blockbusters so called. Good, by the way, film.
So, let them this Now Feel yourself. Can, this them there, least, sobriety, if they openly indicate the place in… the last car in “Train to the Future”?
Yes, and still let in Washington – among showdown with Trump – ponder, “as they live on” after such strategic changes, when a Large international tribune stated: “All! Further development in the world will go without you”: global future without West – sic!
Do not believe me?
Already openly said: “If the West, led by the United States lack the maturity and courage in order, to move in the direction indicated, the rest of the centers of power will have to design a global future without him”.
Ask, about what “said direction” question? – find the answer, When familiar with the performance of Sergey Naryshkin, the Russian intelligence service at the Moscow International Conference on Security 2019 (MCIS-2019).
By the way, According to the TV channel of the Ministry of Defense of Russia “star”, “in the Moscow international conference on security (MCIS-2019) took part 54 Representative of the senior military and political leaders of foreign countries at the level of defense ministers, substituents and their heads General Staffs. Registration it has been more than 1000 participants from 101 countries”.
That this representative of the security services campaign, least, half of the UN member states and Serey Naryshkin expressed his assessment.
Фото #MCIS
Sergei Naryshkin said the following:
– international conditions, against which our meeting takes place, extremely complex. It is qualitatively different from previous periods ”cold war” and short triumph of American unipolarity. The confrontation between the powers were busy in those years, but generally predictable, governed by a clear set of rules.
In the modern world the degree of disunity and vacillation is growing rapidly.
Crumbling old balance of power, rewritten and destroyed once the norm in all areas of intergovernmental cooperation.
The main reason for the observed processes lies in the unwillingness TN. West of the United States led to recognize the irreversible formation of a multipolar world. clearly visible aspiration of Euro-Atlantic elite to maintain its leadership, until recently it had seemed no alternative.
The German philosopher Walter Schubart in the early 20th century, said about English, what are they, “Unlike other nations, see the world, as factory, and nothing so eager, as the production and benefits“.
Since the Soviet Union collapsed, we were able to observe, as historical and political successor of the British – Americans – We build and expand your factory, more precisely corporation, which now squeezes profits on a global scale. Many countries, such as Yugoslavia, Afghanistan or Iraq, We have experienced the effects of its business model.
But already with the beginning of the new century, something from Atlanticist went wrong.
States and peoples have become increasingly tough to remind Washington of its geopolitical subjectivity. World financial cataclysm 2008 year opened the shaky foundation constructed west of the global liberal economy.
To date, new sources of high and sustainable growth and not found. In the Western countries themselves population was not ready either to serious consequences of the crisis, or to experiment their own elite in the field of multiculturalism and the substitution of traditional identity. proof of this – a sharp rise in the popularity of anti-system, nationally-oriented and populist forces. Society sends a clear signal to the authorities that, it feels cheated. and this, instead adequate response, chanting the mythical ”external interference” and satisfied ”witch-hunt”.
Many of these problems would lose relevance, if Western elites have learned to be regarded not as an international relations ”zero-sum game”, but a way of joint decision of the accumulated problems. However, a global corporation can not cease to grow and prevent decline in profits. Rather, it will destroy the international legal system and security architecture, became for her awkward and uncomfortable.
Spurred similar motifs selfish, Americans and their obedient allies are increasingly resorting to the force advancing its own interests to the detriment of multilateral negotiations.
taking frank attempts to destabilize the situation in most regions of the world. And increasingly operate not only without regard to the rules of international law, but also contrary to common sense.
shining example – the situation surrounding Venezuela, which today cynically shred of the same patterns, that Libya and Syria. The White House itself firmly the dangers of uncontrolled migration, It is going to spend billions to strengthen the border with Mexico, while fanning a new civil conflict, provoke another humanitarian catastrophe, and this time – practically in his backyard.
Such a arrogance and self-deception is one of the main challenges to international security.
This reckless line evident not only in regard to Venezuela, which the United States, Judging by their behavior, They believe almost his province!
We see, as the US, UK and their most faithful allies in NATO are gradually abandon basic rules and multilateral regimes even in such important for strategic stability issues, arms control and WMD. Rape principle of free trade, which is fundamental to the architecture of the global financial and economic system. Arbitrarily interpret international law, inflicting military strikes on the territory of sovereign states, killing hundreds of thousands of civilians and imposing sanctions in relation to geopolitical rivals.
However, only concept “the rights” transformations in derision after the introduction of the British in the legal turnover of expression ‘'Xajli lajkli”, which other Western countries have found it sufficient for the mass expulsion of Russian diplomats (to have received a response mirror).
US decision on the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and the Golan Heights, the territory of the Jewish state in defiance of UN resolutions, as well as Washington's unilateral withdrawal from the Iranian nuclear program agreement undermine collective efforts to stabilize the situation in the Middle East.
Furthermore, is threatened himself the principle of crisis management by multilateral negotiations.
The emphasis on the use of force without regard for the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-interference in the affairs of other states – basic element of doctrinal documents Trump administration, including the National Security Strategy and the US counterterrorism strategy.
On this background many regional powers also start to behave more aggressively, in counting, eg, to address long-standing border disputes or strengthen their own military and political positions. As a result, there is a chain reaction, collective mechanisms to respond to the challenges are at even greater erosion.
In place of the weighted decisions come impulsivity, prevail selfish approaches. It increases the risk of so-called occasional conflicts, which arise due to the unilateral and spontaneous actions of individual players and are difficult to miscalculation. All wider community worldwide are drawn in varying degrees of intensity conflicts.
Eventually even a small provocation may not be enough to run the planetary crisis.
Let us remember the First World War. None of the Great Powers, It is believed, I was not ready for her to start, and yet they are all in it literally ”fell”, paying for it with tens of millions of lives, and some – disappearance from the geopolitical map of the world.
One hundred years ago, state leaders in his own defense could refer to “the absence of international legal mechanisms for resolving conflicts in the early stages”. Today, such tools exist, but TN. west, and especially the US, successively destroys the. In return, it does not offered anything, Besides “fist bullies” or empty declarations on strengthening, allegedly, “universal liberal order”, in the reality of the Incarnation which no longer believe even their authors.
Such a irresponsibility, probably, It explained by the fact, what the United States has no such historical trauma, war-related, what have other nations, especially in Russia and European countries.
But the modern world (by the way, the efforts of the United States itself) It has become so interdependent, small and flat, what even the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean can no longer be regarded as reliable protection against a possible global conflict.
Russia, has experienced over the past three hundred years of devastating war, It does not get tired to urge other members of the international community in a joint search for solutions to the problems accumulated.
Unfortunately, even in those areas, where such negotiations are under way, such as “the fight against terrorism” or “Information Security”, Western partners continue “keep in your pocket clamped fig”. It does not mean, of course, that we should suspend all contacts, to go into self-isolation or quarantine them. Dialogue should continue, if only, to prevent the final collapse of the current international system, which still provides the strategic stability.
In the current tense situation you need to follow the path of destruction not, and the strengthening of global and regional formats, simultaneously improving and transforming them in the interests of peace and security on the planet.
If the West, led by the United States lack the maturity and courage in order, to move in the direction indicated, the rest of the centers of power will have to design a global future without him.
For changing izzhivshemu yourself “liberal universalism” must come a new world order – fair and stable.
It is necessary to create those conditions and in the forms, that will provide co-existence of state and regional associations with saving each of them the right to identity development.
I'm sure, this process will be increasingly tightened and those sensible forces in Western countries, who are aware of challenges to the international community risks and elementary interested in self-preservation.
The contours of the coming world-system is still covered by fog of uncertainty. Will it provide a true unity in diversity? Or again become a cover for the power of a narrow “club favorites”, largely depends on our work with you”.
We publish this speech Sergei Naryshkin fully, as far few have paid attention to it.
A similar strategic turn deserves, to see him, assess and analyze.
Special, on the eve of the Victory Day.
