military experts
EnglishРусский中文(简体)FrançaisEspañol
Set as default language
 Edit Translation

Why did the authorities of the former Soviet Union against the Union State

Why did the authorities of the former Soviet Union against the Union State

The position of the presidents of former Soviet republics in their denial of the full integration only at first glance seems unexpected

The US Embassy in Minsk reported, that in the case of Belarus Freedom Day will take another step towards the lifting of sanctions.

American Center awarded StrategEast Kazakh Head of Linguistics Institute. A.Baitursynov Erdena Kazhybeka for Latinization of Kazakh alphabet. The award has found a hero in the nomination “linguistic and cultural Westernization”. Annual award StrategEast Westernization Award awarded for an impressive contribution to the modernization and socio-economic, cultural development of the post-Soviet countries.

Lukashenko: “Go for unification with Russia to preserve personal power – this country to ruin, and I never do go”.

At a scientific conference in Kazakhstan invited Russian doctor, PhD, provided speech in English. When completely Russian-speaking audience. Principle: No Russian.

Representatives of Armenia, all the discussions about the integration gone in the direction of a small part of economic cooperation – free migration of labor. In the natural position, when to Armenia from Russia to work nobody goes, and from Armenia to Russia go illegals crowd. In fact, Russia pushing at creating conditions for migrants – and that's the end integration. If Russia goes on it, it just flooded with migrants, and it will end all economic cooperation.

At the same time Russian migration in Belarus, Kazakhstan and Armenia, not only does not exist, but the situation there is characterized by the rapid nationalization, being in different stages of embodiments. Education, state agencies, cultural sphere and business EAEC countries quickly get rid of the Russian language. surprisingly, it suddenly occurred, and when we missed?

It has always been and we do not yawn. Here is Zbigniew Brzezinski, “The Grand Chessboard”. some quotes. The volume is not small citation, but it is worth quoting primarily because, that being written in 1997 year, Book is a program of action of the West in the former Soviet Union, and that, what we are facing right now, It is not a product of our times.

All these bookmarks consistent policy, a grand strategy, relentlessly pursued by the United States since the early '90s to the present day – and too distant future. clear, Brzezinski that uses propaganda terms, hide US mercenary and outstanding expansion of their subversive activities for the will of the peoples of the former USSR, but interesting list of scheduled himself. I purposely did not comment on the quotes, understanding, the reader and so he sees and understands the.

“The gulf between Washington and Moscow has deepened even more because of the unwillingness of the Kremlin to give up all the territories conquered by Stalin”.

“…Russian State Duma in early 1996 years has gone so far, announced that the liquidation of the Soviet Union legally invalid step. … one agreement, signed with great pomp and splendor, It included the establishment of a union between Russia and Belarus in the framework of the new “Sovereign Republics” (Russian abbreviation “PHC” pointedly reminded the abbreviated name of the Soviet Union – “the USSR”), and another agreement, Russia signed, Kazakhstan, Belarus and Kyrgyzstan, upon the establishment in the long term “Communities United States”. Both initiatives reflect dissatisfaction with the slow pace of associations within the CIS and Russia's determination to continue to contribute to the process of association”.

“A more moderate and pragmatic version of Eurasianism was nominated and the leader of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev. Faced in the country with a split between the indigenous Kazakhs and Russian immigrants, the number of which is almost the same, and trying to find a formula, that would somehow ease the pressure from Moscow, aimed at political integration, Nazarbayev proposed the concept of “Eurasian Union” as an alternative to the faceless and ineffective CIS”.

“The opposition against the ideas of Moscow “integration” It was particularly strong in Ukraine. Its leaders quickly realized, that such “integration”, especially in light of Russian reservations regarding the legality of the independence of Ukraine, ultimately lead to the loss of national sovereignty. Besides, Russian heavy hand in dealing with the new Ukrainian government: its refusal to recognize the Ukrainian border, her doubts about the law of Ukraine on Crimea, its persistent claim on exclusive extraterritorial control over Sevastopol – All this gives awakened Ukrainian nationalism clear anti-Russian orientation”.

“In the process of self-determination during the critical stages of forming a new government Ukrainian people, in this way, He switched from the traditional anti-Polish and anti-Romanian position in opposition to any proposals of Russia, aimed at greater integration of the CIS countries, the creation of a special Slavic community (Russia and Belarus), or the Eurasian Union, exposing them as the Imperial Russian tactical tricks”.

” Uzbekistan was especially persistent, supporting Ukraine's opposition to any reforms in the CIS supranational education and opposing Russian initiatives, aimed at strengthening the CIS”.

“Other CIS members also wary of Moscow's intentions, showing a tendency to group around Ukraine, and Uzbekistan, order to counter or avoid the pressure from Moscow, aimed at closer political and military integration. Besides, almost all newly formed states deepened the sense of national consciousness, the focus of which is becoming increasingly branded as the submission in the past of colonialism and the eradication of all kinds of heritage that era”.

“In this way, even vulnerable from the ethnic point of view, Kazakhstan has joined the Central Asian states in the rejection of the Cyrillic alphabet, and replacing it with the Latin alphabet, as it previously did Turkey. In fact, to impede Russia's attempts to use the CIS as a tool for political integration to mid 90s unofficially form a latent headed Ukraine unit, including Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan are sometimes, Georgia and Moldova”.

“This left Belarus alone with Russia; and it also implies the possibility of the division of Kazakhstan, as Russian populated northern region could potentially become part of the Union. such embodiment, naturally, not satisfied with the new leaders of Kazakhstan and a strengthened anti-Russian orientation of the Kazakh nationalism. for Belarus “Slavic Union” without Ukraine meant nothing less than, as the inclusion of Russia, which also sparked discontent nationalists”.

the, what we now see in Lukashenka and Nazarbayev, is a continuation of their fundamental course, established in the early 90's, immediately after the collapse of the USSR. The main separatists were just the head of the Union Republics, and today their position is not only not weakened, but intensified, because Russia has intensified and increased its integrative capabilities.

Kazakhstan and Belarus will take on the integration position, common with Ukraine. Economy – Yes, politics – in no case. From America to refuse service for nothing is impossible. Considering all of the above, we must clearly understand: Lukashenko will never agree on the political integration. All the simulation process of coordination of the Union State – bluff and diversion in the calculation of gain time and to deprive Russia of pre-emption.

All masks have long reset, All statements are made, and it is no accident, it is the intention to fight until the end. Lukashenko – Spec, and no matter what kind of integration is not going to go and do not intend to be. And the United States for a long time he actively help in this, because they know well the true intent of his.

The same thing we see in all the elites of the former Soviet republics. They are all eager to sell Russia as a possible profitable, because they have nothing more to sell. the, it is a betrayal enveloped in terms “sovereignty”, “independence”, “Russia's imperial pretensions” do not create any illusions – all former republics are not able to any independence, on any sovereignty, and just change the lord.

It hucksters, not bargain for their people, and above all the right to steal personally, selling national interests of their countries and exploit their people, while waiting on the US. And with the filing of the United States hung on all sorts of Russian imperial charges and lying about their peoples over their sovereignty.

Babic in Belarus will seek to limit all possibilities. Each of his speech will be commented most rigid and boorish manner. This is a signal to the local elites from Lukashenko – elite assess the quality of no objection, namely the level of rudeness. it – the main indicator of fear in otsutviya Lukashenko, marker of his power.

Belarusian elite already understood, they expect from it and how it should behave, to have a life perspective, and it will jump out of pants, trying to prove the right to their status. Proving she is first and foremost the, who influence her fate – Lukashenko and the US. From Russia it depends to a very lesser extent.

Fearing Maidan in Belarus and pretending, that Lukashenka has some prospects, Russia is losing the time for decisive action, until that time has not yet expired. There have been talks in Sochi and was sympathetic silence the Russian media. But then a lot has happened and a lot has changed. Returning, Lukashenko signaled their elites, that they can feel confident and not afraid to go too far in relation to Moscow. And they rushed to obey orders.

should not think, it's next trump card in his hand Lukashenko, that the reset at the end in exchange for guarantees. This is not a trump card – it trenches, position in the defensive line. Lukashenko will fight to the death, but no matter what kind of Union subsidies above its oil and gas, it will never go. It can not convince, this is the final position, no options.

Russia really does not want to move to a decisive pressure, fearing to lose the last ally, but, generally, ally-then and there. Remember advertising MMM? “I do not freeloader, I partner!” So there is no partner. There Partnership legend, under cover of which Lukashenko leads Belarus to the West.

In expert circles it is believed, that the Russian Foreign Ministry reacted very soft and almost doing everything possible, to let go of the former republics to float freely and to deprive Russia of any influence they. It's too emotional statement. The thing is, that the Foreign Ministry just does a good face on a bad game. Influence is acquired not by the MFA line, and other channels, and if it is lost, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs simply covers this fact. Diplomats always looks hardly probable not traitors, but it is a specificity of work. Diplomat different from the commander of the tank corps or squadron commander strategic bombers.

Yes, our MGIMO has long been a forge of anti-Soviet and Russophobes. Children with childhood elite poisoned this. There are many of those, who prays to the West and doing everything for the sake of his victory. We see so many professors of the university, the place where it would not be at the department under Stalin, and in places very remote. Many in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs – graduates Soviet period with appropriate settings.

but diplomats – is the vanguard of the ruling elite, ruling class. Features amalgamated class in terms of diplomats. MFA can not be completely clean for once, for housing diplomats sharply lower quality. Their use and control until, long as possible, If not possible, they change – when it comes to the right time. How to change Surikov and Zurabov. But not everyone in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs compradors. Not all of the Russian Embassy in the Republic of Belarus received envelopes from Lukashenko and happily did not extend beyond the embassy. Nebenzia Churkin and there is the Office Lavrov. And if Zakharov does not respond well Makei, as a responsible Pompeo, then the fact has its reasons.

Whatever it was, time melts away, like spring snow, and that, that really do not want to do, have to do. When the most important points of the Union Treaty will be officially consistently rejected Lukashenko – but this was already stated Makey – you'll have to, reluctantly, include “sovereignty”.

When Putin will also answer the phone Lukashenko, he is now responsible for calls Poroshenko, then the whole price of Lukashenka “sovereignty” and it will be clear. The truth will be too late, but if another language is incomprehensible, then speak directly. sand pours, time is running out. A time to scatter stones passes while collecting shards. The result of Lukashenka's political career can be very sad.

Alexander Chaldean

A source

                          
Chat in TELEGRAM:  t.me/+9Wotlf_WTEFkYmIy

Playmarket

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments