Dear comrade Karl Marx was suspicious of the mathematical methods of studying society. Wrote, that the effectiveness of the application of mathematics in this area tends to zero. But towards the end of his life he became interested in calculations, started scribbling "mathematical manuscripts", which his friend and good sponsor Engels kept, however, most of the profty. Yes, it's all about Zelensky and the presidential elections in Ukraine. It is necessary to take a serious and thorough approach to the analysis of trends. Especially since today, while I was writing this article, literally in front of my eyes they enthroned Epiphanius. Guys, this is awful! Never do that.
so here, about Marx. Faculty of Philosophy, Unfortunately, failed to instill in me a love for the creative heritage of Karl and, especially, Engels. Hegel clung much more. Not least because, what the hell is impossible to understand. After the tenth reading of the paragraph, one gets the impression, that you grabbed the tip of the thought, but then make sure: no, didn't catch. Brother, dialectics, you are heartless with ... ka! But over time, I began to see clearly in relation to our Karl. Man set high standards for revolutionary struggle. For example, lived in Brussels, in the very center, on the Grand Place, in a buiding, which bears the romantic name "Swan", scribbled "Capital" there. true, Expert opinions differ on this issue.. Some write, that he didn’t sprinkle “Capital” there, a, quite the opposite, worked on "economic and philosophical manuscripts". Others laugh at the first, mock Poroshenko and point out, that Marx worked on manuscripts in Paris. not important. But when I had the opportunity to go on a cheap tour of Europe on a terribly fuming bus, I first looked at some Marxist and even Leninist places. Normal guys fought. answer. On the ground floor of Lebed there is an excellent pub. All pubs in Brussels are great., I do not know, what is the secret. Carl didn't even have to strain. Sat at the computer in the morning, sprinkled something Marxist, went down, screwed up a beer and back to work. And Engels regularly replenishes his friend's account in some local Privat. Or is he shooting with a "Western". beauty!
Vladimir Ilyich also found a normal pub in Zurich. true, I'm not sure, what was in that, because we were given two hours. However, I liked the city., even though it's boring. And everything is expensive, from…ka.. so here, what am I all about? The founders were quite interesting in preparing for the upcoming revolutionary processes, had the opportunity to brainstorm in a pleasant environment. And here you sit and watch the intronization. All the leadership of the nation has come, which is separated from the church. However, no one can, with ka ..., stop looking at, what they do according to Constantinople patterns with the leader of the HCU? No one. Therefore, Poroshenko is sitting, watching, First Deputy Prime Minister Kubiv (former caretaker of the burnt House of Trade Unions) sits, other officials. Speaker Parubiy, characteristically, no. for nothing, missed a lot. Not every day in the center of Kyiv people are enthroned.
Generally, you are participating in the process, because it is forced to communicate with a number of subjects, having varying degrees of Maidan e ... nuttiness. in Brussels, I think, easier to maintain high standards of journalism and be equidistant from all kinds of political shit. Yes, know, what many want to understand, what is it all about.
Sociology, gentlemen! Vladimir Ilyich reasonably considered her a corrupt girl of imperialism. He still had a lot of corrupt girls, but this, in his opinion, some kind of creepy. Marx was more tolerant in this regard.. Even received his sight, as I wrote at the beginning, at the end of life. Became interested in mathematical models, that, so, win at the casino. Well, in "blackjack", roulette or a trivial "point". The old man sensed the potential. And now, when before 31 March is less than two months away, sociology has become the most important of the sciences of our nation. Not to mention, of course, "Tomosology" and thorough theosophical research of Pyotr Alekseevich, who delve deeply into eschatology, that is, in the doctrine of its end. of course, political. The people want to know, who will be our president. Sociologists, like experienced prostitutes, are trying to meet the sharply increased demand for their services.. The closer to the elections, the more demand. No other source of information, after all, if you watch Ukrainian television and read patriotic public, you can not only become an idiot, but also to believe in the victory of Petro Poroshenko.
Since June last year, Yulia Tymoshenko has been the undisputed leader of the presidential races.. She is Kytsunder, aka "Madura" (stress is on the second syllable). Second places alternately occupied by Anatoly Gritsenko ("real colonel", called by the Prosecutor General Lutsenko "Mr ... Mr."), singer-preacher Vyacheslav Vakarchuk, but not Peter Alekseevich.
FROM 15 December to 19 January Poroshenko actively began to implement the religious and mystical plan "Resurrection". Tomos acted as an electoral "Viagra". Something unimaginable happened. Many believed in the triune essence of Poroshenko - President-Father, president-in-chief and president-holy spirit. And all, naturally, interested in one purely mathematical question: will this "Viagra" work on the electorate? Sociologists kept intrigue, because they drank on New Year's holidays. And the intrigue swelled, after all, exactly at midnight, the famous comedian and the local analogue of your "Bulldog" Kharlamov Vladimir Zelensky said, what he wants too. For president. Many have felt, that some gigantic mechanism for changing the mental attitudes of the nation began to work. I can't describe his action so beautifully, How would Marx do it?, Lebon or the same Jung. However, the air clearly smelled of burnt tomos., because Zelensky rode some powerful psychedelic wave and some people began to burn. Political strategists of the leader of the nation were the first to feel an unpleasant smell and quickly, literally on the go, ideologically "changed shoes" of the still incumbent president. Therefore, on a forum with the name, made up of meaningless geographical names and erotic direction ("From Kruty to Brussels: we go our own way"), a completely different Peter Alekseevich appeared before the audience. The wrinkled jacket is the same, the software settings have changed.. Instead of the traditional "army, language, faith" - "welfare, order and economic growth”. And another "cold peace with Putin". What does this mean - no one understood. Even the authors of the speech, since the coke ran out, but they didn't bring a new one. Just "either Poroshenko, or Putin. This slogan was put forward.
Accurately after the show with self-nomination and the results of a mathematical measurement of the peculiarities of the work of the brain of Ukrainians were published. As many as four sociological offices took measurements. One alone, and three together. Our last education is called "pool", And it didn't happen by accident.. It's all about pure mathematics.
I'm a bit familiar with sociological cuisine, because at one time he knocked out debts from people, withholding payment for surveys, organized the printing of questionnaires, and once even filled the face of a future professor of sociology. Old story, I don't want to go deep into it. See, what alignment: before the elections, especially presidential, the number of people who want to stimulate the work of sociologists-mathematicians is growing at some wild progression. Everyone wants to give money, so there are so many temptations. At one time, five sociological offices worked simultaneously for us, who took money from different candidates (parties), as a result of which vulgar showdowns began. Why should I have won, for example, Tymoshenko, and it turned out Yanukovych? Troubled sociological times have come. Offices wet each other, proving, that only their calculations are representative. But what if a completely different person won the election? (party), so these are questions for idiot voters, who have no idea about sociological sampling at all.
In the end greed won. Sociologists have entered into a kind of convention. The point is, to take money from the client together. One is better than many, than several and individually. In the latter case, the image of all representatives of this ancient and very interesting profession suffers.. In addition, the costs of social production are sharply reduced.: as if three studies are being carried out, but in fact one. But at the price of three plus a bonus for harmfulness.
A sociological “pool” was formed before the March elections, consisting of the Center for Social and Marketing Research "Socis", Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KMIS) and the Razumkov Center (the first husband of the current wife of the candidate Gritsenko). According to their data,, that Zelensky is in first place with an amazing result in 23 percent, on the second, which is also sensational, Petro Poroshenko (16,4%), and the leader of the race Tymoshenko fell to the third position (15,7%). This is the latest data. The next one will be at the end of February.. Let's apply objective mathematical methods to the analysis of the obtained data. What conclusions can be drawn? At first, two offices "ssu…fox", deciding to cut money on their own. We broke the convention. It's about these players., as "Democratic Initiatives" and "Rating" agency.
Secondly, the theoretical exit of the incumbent president to the second round does not save from the realization of a simple fact: "Comic couplets" performed by Zelensky on New Year's Eve surpassed Tomos in popularity, field mass in nine regional centers of the nation, language and army. Foreign diplomats were instantly alarmed, accredited in Kyiv. A collective meeting of the diplomatic corps with the new leader of the Ukrainian elections was held. Ambassadors of France, Germany, Poland was horrified. Vova could not clearly answer a single question about the implementation of the Minsk agreements! He only talked about direct negotiations with Putin. To the remark of the Frenchman - “And if the radicals burn the Presidential Administration, in that case what will you do?"- Zelensky did not respond, just crushed a lip. I think, our "partners" had a meeting with the wrong. It was necessary to call Vova's consultant on all issues Igor Kolomoisky. He would tell them, I explained, would enter into their position and leave them in the position. Practically according to Zhvanetsky.
Participants of the sociological "pool" clearly worked out the money, brought by him in a package from under the seafood store Egersund Seafood by an army friend of Poroshenko, completely bald Igor Kononenko. They "brought" Petr Alekseevich to the second round, "drawing" him a "victory" over Tymoshenko within the framework of the sociological error of the study. However, with Zelensky's rating, suddenly risen above the nation, "professionals" could not do anything. Pret up, contagion.
Thirdly, the survey authors failed to explain, why the clown "broke" the two favorites of the race. They usually pay off the money invested, talk about the "overflow of the electorate", protest moods and psychological fatigue of voters. But in this case, the picture is frighteningly clear.: for a Russian-speaking comedian, humiliating, according to the patriots, "national dignity of the nation", 23% of Ukrainians are ready to cast their votes. it, if you want to, complete collapse of the ideals of the European Maidan.
Now about the "pissed" sociologists. Irina Bekeshkina's Democratic Initiatives Foundation and the Rating agency competed very fiercely for the money of another "sponsor" - the Americans. They kind of "stand above the fray", but they really keep their finger on the pulse. In our realities, true, it is appropriate to say "hold a hand on the crotch" of one of the candidates. Won "Rating". They asked everyone separately., and it turned out, that Kolomoisky is in the lead in the person of Zelensky - 19 percent. Not 23, like "pool", and four less. Second place is drum roll., screams of horror - Yulia Tymoshenko with an indicator 18,2%. The leader of the nation is modestly content 15,1%, dropping out of the finals of an exciting and in many ways instructive campaign. You don't have to be a mathematician and live in Brussels, to see: the accents are quite different. However, in general, all sociological studies unambiguously indicate that, that Ukraine is confidently turning into a resident of the Comedy Club. the, what started as a tragedy, turns into a comedy. And as according to the "pool" version, as well as agencies, completed order of the State Department.
And finally, about the opposition. We have a lot. Tymoshenko represents the "democratic opposition". Anatoly Gritsenko and the Lviv mayor Sadovaya are the European-State Departmental opposition. There is still opposition from the southeast. She is, in its turn, is divided into Akhmetov and "Boiko" parts. The first one is presented by Viktor Medvedchuk's project "Opposition Platform" by Yuriy Boyko, the second - by Alexander Vilkul and, perhaps, Evgeny Muraev. "Mathematical" results give the following picture of the opposition. State Department version ("Rating"): Yuriy Boyko - 10%, Anatoly Gritsenko - 8,5%, Evgeny Muraev - 3,5%, Andrey Sadovoy - 2,7%, Alexander Vilkul - 2,6%.
Pool option: Boyko – 9,3%, Hrytsenko - 8,1%, Sadovaya - 3,4%, Muraev - 2,7%, Wilkul - 2,4%. Almost identical figures for the two options regarding the opposition. Lyashko I don't mention, as this is the same-sex future of the nation. We must draw conclusions? To my mind, everything is obvious. Rinat Leonidovich is trying to play along with Poroshenko, by launching the "Vilkul project" (in a form like anti-Poroshenko, but in fact, downright "Maidan"). But it loses on two fronts at once. At first, Igor Kolomoisky acts much more efficiently, but you have to understand, that Igor Valerievich and Rinat Leonidovich communicate with each other exclusively constructively, sending each other in diametrically opposite directions. Secondly, even partial implementation of the strategy to unite the opposition, implemented by Medvedchuk, brought Boyko to a much higher electoral orbit, than Vilkula. Usually, this is where the accusations begin, what is this "advertising of Boyko", “an attempt to overestimate the merits of Medvedchuk” and so on. Guys, just relax and vote for Zelensky. Let really all this protracted clowning end in the form of a grotesque. Why not? Fortunately, “shifts” in mentality have really been colossal.
