One famous (what is there famous - THE LARGEST!) video hosting gave me the documentary film "Legend of the Tank" in the recommendations (attached), released on the channel "Russia-1". He tells about the history of the famous T-34 - one of the symbols of the Great Victory and the Russian technical genius. The first minutes are interesting, looks easy, well received, happy selection of speakers. But ... Everywhere there is a "but". Here, this “but” became a whole doctor of historical sciences, real professor Oleg Budnitsky. He is not a professor in some sharashka office like Moscow State University (sarcasm, if anything), and respected, even the respectable Higher School of Economics – national research university , about the activities of which many have questions.
The bright face of Pan Professor
It would seem, what questions can be? Young (It founded in 1992 year) successful university, high salaries for teachers, the university is growing ... But it was created by order of the notorious Yegor Gaidar, and even with Soros money. Generally, Lots of information on the net about this., there are even excellent investigations - you can perfectly search for yourself. I will only say, that HSE is a natural hotbed of Russophobia in the minds of our youth.
Here are such “absolute professionals” (by definition of himself Navalny) invite to discuss at HSE
by the way, HSE Rector Yaroslav Kuzminov Names Alumni, eg, technical schools (those working hands, much needed by our country) social morons…
Identifier of social morons Yaroslav Kuzminov
But back to the "Legend of the Tank". What confused me? Mr. Budnitsky directly said the following: What should be understood about the pre-war USSR? This is a poor peasant country.". Further pan historian spreads thought along the tree, talking about, how agriculture was destroyed before the war and concludes: "It was a war of the rich, modern European country, based on the resources of a number of European countries, and countries, which essentially destroyed its agriculture and could not feed itself or could feed itself with great difficulty, because it had to be done: put Russia on the cards!». Here is such a terrible scoop…
And that's just kinco
But let! I, eg, wrote about the pre-war USSR… Not being a historian, for some reason I was able to talk about the agriculture of the Russian Empire and the early USSR, show the fate of arable land (and them in us, actually, not much - most of the country is a zone of risky farming) and measures, adopted to overcome the food crisis. measures, admittedly, very effective. Although I was more offended by the words about a poor peasant country: apparently, any impoverished peasant is able to buy an airplane or a tank ... Yes, and to call the country a peasant country with that outflow of peasants to the cities - apparently, pan historian simply treats with contempt the science he studies.
This raises a simple question: is it possible to call a poor peasant country a power, ranked second in the world in terms of industrial production? A tenth of TOTAL world production was concentrated in a "poor peasant country". by the way, By the time of its collapse, the USSR already had 20% world industry. But Russia, which “chooses” the path of “freedom and democracy”,, through the efforts of the characters, directly involved in the emergence of HSE in our country, at 1997 had a share in world production already 1,8%. by the way, at 1945 year, the production capacity of the USSR amounted to 92% from capacities 1941 of the year. War of Survival, on some points, hurt us less, than the economic reforms of the "fathers" of the Higher School of Economics.
AT 1931 year Stalin said: “We have lagged behind the advanced countries by 50-100 years. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or we will be crushed". The distance we have traveled. This is one of the greatest feats of our people. AND, apparently, Budnitsky's task is to make this feat something shameful. Well, how not to? Some poor peasants dared to defeat modern Europeans (I also wrote about the state of affairs in pre-war Germany)! Yes, and "see" to the capital itself! But aren't these Europeans paying Pan historian money?
One famous native of Budapest with the surname Soros (that's Schwartz, but who cares anyway…)
And the activities of Budnitsky, which the, by the way, according to wikipedia, writes about terrorism in the Russian Empire (right in the headline calling female terrorists "selfless killers", and the name of his other material – "Blood of Conscience"), the jews (also being the editor-in-chief of the "Archive of Jewish History"), traitors ("Happened. The Germans came!», where he diligently justifies with the horrors of Soviet power those who are going over to the side of the Germans and their European allies who came to destroy us), directly aimed at denigrating OUR history, full of victories and great achievements. In their "scientific" (although it is more correct to call them propaganda) writings, eg, pan historian likes to talk about low life expectancy in the USSR, a bit confused about the numbers, but limits it 40 years. And it almost doesn't lie: at 1939 year, the average duration was only 47 years (Urlanis B.U. Fertility and life expectancy in the USSR. M., 1963. from. 103-104). That's just in 1917 year she was at the mark in 32 of the year…
Soviet athletes of the 30s
Pan historian does not hesitate to emotionally color his speeches: “Most people have a poor idea of how, actually, the life of people in the Soviet Union was terrible, in purely material, physical, physiological sense of the word. Colors and hides, how this life has changed for the vast majority of the population in comparison with life in the Republic of Ingushetia. But why do people need to know, that we had a great country? People should repent. People should spit on the graves of their ancestors!
comments are unnecessary
it seems, the portrait of the speaker is clear in general terms. And a fact, that this historian is given not only to teach youth, but also the airtime is depressing. Doubly depressing is the fact, that this airtime is not given to him anywhere, and on state channels. In particular, on the same channel, where the whole deputy general director of this very channel, Dmitry Kiselyov, on Sundays, carefully tries to instill in viewers a slightly different picture of the world.
Disappointing and more: our entire mass "film culture", more precisely that part of it, that tells about the Great Patriotic War, permeated with some kind of fierce hatred for the USSR: Yes, there is a soldier (or officer), who selflessly fights ... And there are commanders, NKVD officers, who are exposed either as clinical idiots, or sadists. The whole country by camp, detachments of SMERSH people drive "meat" for slaughter, "Shooters" from the future receive weapons without special checks, priests and criminals from penal battalions almost on their own hump ensure the entire success of the offensive, and deep in the rear they are preparing juvenile saboteurs ... And films, where there is no such anti-Soviet propaganda, very few... I, of course, didn't look at all, but "28 Panfilov", "Single", "Brest Fortress" – it's a drop in the ocean. A sort of spoonful of honey in a barrel of shit, which water the brains of the domestic audience. Yes, and at public expense.
Barin says, that they fought.
The saddest, that the layman, living in this one, carefully crafted with Soros money "reality", doesn't even cross my mind, that their world is replete with the simplest logical inconsistencies, distortions and outright delirium.
The sad fact, what about the current access to the archives (and you can get copies of documents of interest without even leaving your home), with the current abundance of ways to spread information, with the presence of truly OBJECTIVE historians, not shy to show the pros and cons of our history, draw conclusions and explain, why exactly, some sort of guilt complex continues to be imposed on our average person from the screens of state channels, from cinema screens, showing false slops filmed with state support.
Paradox: Minister of Culture Medinsky writes articles on the memory of the Great Victory, and his subordinates allocate money on this very memory denigration. Interesting, signed by the minister?
Medinsky
Did, 5 May 2018 year I watched a crowd of "fighters against the regime", a few days later, 9 May, I saw the formation of the Immortal Regiment. The difference in the number of people is enormous. In favor of Polk.
But why do our TV people and officials do everything, to make a resident of Russia ashamed of his history, and in the past he saw only some Mordor?
