AT 2019 , the North Atlantic military bloc will celebrate its 70th anniversary. Founded in April 1949 , the Alliance was initially positioned as a military-political conglomerate of states to counter Soviet influence in Europe. years passed, and there is no longer the Soviet Union on the world map, but NATO is not only announced the dissolution, but also continues the expansion policy to the east, while increasing its military component in most Russian borders.
To date, as part of NATO 29 nations. In this case, the combined military spending of the Member States have already exceeded 70% from world. Basic supplies for the maintenance of the entire volume of this gigantic war machine laid on the shoulders of ordinary American taxpayers and at the same time working, very hard gears, American printing press.
Every year, the expenditure part of NATO's overall budget grows, And it grows disproportionately. The main growth falls on the US share - in real ratio. Those same Europeans do not burn special desire to inflate military spending and to keep the bar in NATO 2% VVP. it, as is known, USA irritated. And while this situation indicates that, NATO viability Washington today only care in the long run and, perhaps, several fully under his control the governments in the east of the North Atlantic Alliance. Others adhere to the principle: You need, You and funded.
Finance "in person" the US is not willing to, but the craving for expansion, Automatically increases and expenditure, already unquenchable. On the agenda the question of a further step of inflating the bubble NATO. Under the "eye" of the alliance - Macedonia and Georgia. And nothing, that the same prevents Georgia to join the alliance territorial requests to the South Ossetia and Abkhazia. If you want Washington, they can close their eyes to the charter, forbidden to take the state with unresolved territorial problems.
The main issue: assuming, that same Macedonia and Georgia will join the NATO, what's next? If the territorial expansion strategy, along with an increase in costs will continue, and the number of those wishing to join the "elite club" will be reduced to zero - that will take?
options, actually, bit - the continuation of the expansion due to the new "orange" revolutions or direct aggression against the "Dissenters' join - up to Russia's borders. But one, and more - rather expensive. Financial loss will have to "beat", sucking the resources of those countries, that now is difficult to attribute to the category of the rich (so gf Macedonia), and sitting down on their loans. In turn, loans out of nowhere, too, does not take. so, have again to a higher gear to transfer the printing press, multiplying the already gigantic US debt. but debt, would the United States like it or not, sooner or later you will have to pay. wish, to as late as possible, but… In this case you should go to savings, reduce costs. A cost reduction in this case is contrary to NATO's enlargement policy. Vicious circle.
Yield therefrom USA, as it appears, one. sorrowfully, but this greater "Victorious" war, when the United States to all your creditors “forgive debts”. And the war on its own initiative, and it is desirable (US) this, heat to rake in another's hands, own losses were minimal, industrial economy gets nourishment, Corporation reaches windfall. But is it possible in modern conditions to sit out for "puddle", as it is at least a couple of times it turned out at our big "friends"?
