Wide repercussions YouTube-publication, done, to put it mildly, not quite normal videoblogerom. In the role of commander in chief made videoblogera Rosgvardii General Viktor Zolotov Army, I decided to give an answer to Mr. Navalny. Earlier in our information-analytical portal out material "Navalny - Rosgvardiya. 2:0», which he addressed the roller Navalny called "Who among them eats Rosgvardiyu?»
The video accuses Navalny Rosgvardii leadership, to put it mildly, misuse of funds allocated from the budget. And said Rosgvardii guide not just to engage in a debate, but also the forces of General Zolotova debate organized on the very site YouTube - style of modern 'battles', as it is called in the youth environment.
Viktor Zolotov, appeared before the audience in a uniform, He stated, that he would record his answer before, but he was on a business trip - because only today.
Zolotov – correspondence Navalny:
You do not need to take up these topics, since they sound a little void of understanding on your part, because of supply issues (…) price component - this is not your topic. Grasp the other.
Next Zolotov said, that corruption flaws in his department have, but the agency is trying to deal with them.
Zolotov Navalny's claims on declaration:
I'm really not a poor man. When You sit on the potty, I went in the army, I worked in production, It was, by the way, drummer communist labor, then he engaged in business. But who do you, bulk? I want to understand your component.
In general, the statement reminded textbook "And who are you?»
In his address Zolotov announced, that Navalny is a duel - "the ring, of tatami ».
Zolotov:
I promise to make you a few minutes to do a good juicy steak.
Then came the word of, if Navalny continue slanderous attacks on Zolotov or members of his family, the general "will wipe out about his feet".
the impression, there is not enough after that only one: analysis of the situation in the program from the series "Let them talk" with an invitation to the authors of this Youtube-hassle. apparently, issues and disputes in court already ceases to be civilized norm.
