The site NSA (National Security Archive) published materials, which tells, both innings in US President Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969 years) in the United States has plans to destroy the Soviet Union and China. The material, is based on archival materials, contains phrase, describing the US government as the real fascist conglomerate of officials and senior military.
That's one of the reasons of carrying nuclear strike plans of the USSR:
…the destruction of the Soviet Union as a viable society.
Another phrase from the archives:
The main goal - a conclusion the USSR from among the major industrial powers. Destruction must be subjected to some 70% industrial potential (Soviet Union)
At least one first sentence gives a reference to Hitler's interpretations of the causes of the attack on the USSR, and in something even resonates with the plan "Barbarossa".
Details of the US plan are contained in the materials of the SIOP (Single Integrated Operational Plan) June 1964 of the year.
The article notes, SIOP that for a long time been updated and was characterized by the military and political elites of the United States as a "doomsday machine".
From NSA material:
Planning a nuclear war in the United States it was based on the assumptions of the Cold War of the danger of a surprise attack on the Soviet Union, United States. the possibility, that deterrence can fail and that the conflict could erupt, It forced US officials from the defense to seek options for attack. For such purposes SIOP imagined back in the event of a Soviet surprise attack and pre-emptive option in the case of exploration, warning of the impending Soviet attack.
That is, in the United States have tried to explain the plan for the physical destruction of the USSR (as well as China) the, it would be "just back". This riposte in 1964 it was planned to destroy tens of millions of Soviet citizens (more 70% the urban population of the USSR with the industry).
options are also considered in order SIOP, any damage caused by the nuclear standoff eventually incur US. noted, that US losses “will be limited”, but because the plan was seen as quite capable.
