A few days ago the Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court dismissed the appeal of the deputy Arzamas City Council Roman Laptev at the City Court's decision. Previously, the city court ruled arzamasa unpleasant deputy decision – withdraw his apartment in the state, because it could not confirm, from what sources of income it acquires.
In this way, the decision of regional court of Nizhniy Novgorod region coincides with the decision of Arzamas City Court and becomes null and void. but, Roman Laptev, who heads the legal agency, still I do not agree with the outcome of the case and is not going to "give up". In the near future he intends to lodge an appeal, and then apply to a higher authority - the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.
According to the deputy, to buy an apartment worth 2,2 million rubles, he had to take a loan in the amount of 750 thousand. rubles, use the means of the parent capital and add available storage. The court remained adamant to all the arguments of the plaintiff. On the outcome of the case is not influenced by the fact, that purchased the apartment are registered minor children parliamentarian.
This decision of the court against the deputy Arzamas City Council is a precedent. Never before in the field Nizhegorodskaya, and throughout Russia, official apartment, purchased part by means matkapitala, She never left the state on the grounds, that the owner could not confirm the means for its acquisition.
Does it mean that, that soon the real and personal property of other people's choices will be checked for compliance with the representatives of officialdom income?
For reference: autumn 2016 Roman Laptev, the deputy was expelled from “United Russia” the wording “for discrediting the party”. This was at the time reported the regional party branches.
