Beginning with 24 June Iranian capital embraced the new protests, wrote in his blog known Russian writer Anatoly Nesmiyan (El Murid). They are substantially less in scope, than six months ago, but on the whole the same reason – the deteriorating economic situation. This time the reason for the beginning of the protests was the substantial devaluation of the local currency. clear, that is basically the reason to bother directly from big cities, to reach the hinterland consequences later, so now more protests are local and not so numerous.
Nevertheless, performances recurrence rate speaks of deepening crisis, to which the authorities can not cope. Iran is fighting three wars simultaneously – in Iraq, Syria and Yemen, and although strictly formal direct participation in them it does not take but every war is a burden on the economy. In addition to wars, assistance is provided and radical groups in other countries – in Palestine, Lebanon. In a sense, Iranian ayatollahs are increasingly moving to the position of clerical Trotskyism, so to speak. It is important not how people live in your country, it is important to spread the ideas and influence of your ideas. The consequences are the same everywhere – rolling & quot; base country & quot;, which is a donor resources to promote revolutionary ideas, in misery. The same subject, as in Venezuela, Got Game with his Bolivarian Revolution, ideas which she maniacally and persistently shoved all its neighbors.
In Iran until Venezuela, but it is also.
We can not say, that Iran does not understand the threats, but the existing system of power and control makes it impossible to go on a different path of development. Existing paramilitary structures and institutions such as the IRGC and the Basij have their own economies, does not work on the country, and on the promotion of projects in the Shiite region, respectively, Secular authorities can not influence these controlled only a spiritual power structure. At the same time projects promoting Shiite zone in the region have priority over the country's development projects. The result is the, one side, degradation of the Iranian economy, with another – Iran will inevitably become an outcast in the region and the world, which additionally has a depressing effect on its economy.
Problems are not solved, they accumulate. protests, of course, They are more a marker of what is happening, they are not able to shake the stability of the regime – Winter events shown, that without the support of the organization and at least some part of the elite of any protest & quot; burn out & quot;. However, what is happening demonstrates the systemic crisis in Iran and the failure of the ruling clerical regime to resolve the existing contradictions.
