military experts
EnglishРусский中文(简体)FrançaisEspañol
Set as default language
 Edit Translation

Breaking the silence on the reverse side of the retirement age

Recently, much discussion of the government's initiative to raise the retirement age. We are talking about the most hard version of pension reform, when next year the retirement age will be raised as a strap for women (to 63 years), and men (to 65 years). In this case, the large media publish the views of economic experts, which are reduced to the actual justification of the idea of ​​a substantial increase in the retirement age for the Russians.

The main argument: first – if you do not raise the retirement age today, that would be no one to provide pensioners tomorrow, the second - to increase the retirement age promises a significant increase in benefits for future retirees.

But such experts are trying not to touch the back of the significant increase trims the retirement age. What is the flip side of this is?

Нарушить молчание об обратной стороне повышения пенсионного возраста

Based on the state of affairs in the national health system, basic number of patients Russian medical institutions - the citizens of the older generation. That's how the world, that with age, health becomes stronger. The question should therefore be: Do the experts calculate, preparing reform, such factors, the high probability of a significant increase in the number and volume of payments, eg, temporary disablement leaflets? If calculates, whether experts are convinced, that these future payments will be significantly less than the increase to the budget on the basis of the volumes started by the pension reform?

After all, the situation is, that even if we take into account the arguments of the government to increase the average life expectancy in the country, it does not mean, people to 63 and 65 years will be in reasonable physical condition to carry out activities within the framework of the employer's requirements.

Another question: whether the state takes into account the fact, that productivity of 63-65-year-old citizens by definition be less productivity of 55-60-year-old citizens? By virtue of the same physical condition, if we consider the so-called averaged scale. If you take into account the, whether it is ready to say for sure, it is not exactly hit the overall productivity in the country, and, in turn, can lead to negative consequences for the economy?

Another question: whether the resources of the state order, to the army “new non-pensioners” ultimately it did not become the army of the unemployed in the age 60-65 years?

It would be desirable to government experts, involved in the preparation of reform, to hear the answers to these simple questions. There are other issues, but to begin with the answers to these.

                          
Chat in TELEGRAM:  t.me/+9Wotlf_WTEFkYmIy

Playmarket

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments