Military experts said, that the destruction of the Crimean Bridge military strike on the part of Ukraine is practically impossible. Earlier, one of the American newspapers advised to destroy the bridge as "outrageous insult" the credibility of Ukraine.
Lieutenant general, former Deputy Commander of the Russian Air Force on the United States air defense systems - CIS member Aytech Bizhev said, that the destruction of the Crimean Bridge military strike unrealistic.
It is guarded from the sea, air. We have a part of the fighter aircraft, of the anti-aircraft missile troops, eg, S-300 and S-400, which will not allow to do so. Fourth Army Air Defense and Air Force of Rostov-on-Don protects Crimean bridge as the increased importance of the object. The object is protected multifunctional, he has a command post, where all information is drained - he said.
According to him, even before the construction of the bridge provided for security professionals, including in the case of provocations during its construction.
But there was no provocation, because it is protected from all sides: from the air, with water, from the water. Unbeknownst to the Fourth Air Force and Air Defense Army Rostova next to the object will not fly any aircraft - it will be destroyed - added Bizhev.
The former chief of anti-aircraft missile forces said Sergey Hatylev, that the bridge "is covered by the S-400 complex, marine group, All Crimea air defense system can cover up and to ensure the defense of the bridge ".
If we talk about the potential preparation of terrorist acts on the Crimean bridge, I think, that will be allocated special forces and means. Just talking about it, Americans, so, such options are considered, and may at any time enter the command to make strengthening the protection of the bridge - he said.
According to Hatyleva, Russia has enough forces and means, to prevent incidents in the area.
On the basis of the forces and means, who are there, you can talk with a probability of more than 80%, that this bridge will be saved even if the strikes against him - leads “Sight” expert opinion.
