a photo: social network
What is the option to choose? In a situation, when the unit will operate in the field with the same topography and vegetation and related tactics of ambush enemy action, it is necessary to analyze all the pros and cons of each of the above methods, the following actions and stop at one, that best matches the most likely order of events for this particular area. The method chosen is subject to memorize to automaticity.
If you need to prepare soldiers for actions kontrzasadnym, when the area in the vicinity of the proposed action can be different - and open and closed with the thick vegetation, the rare, or impossible to determine at what areas need to act (standard situation for the military unit in peaceful conditions), you'll have to train soldiers to stop at a certain averaged action method. clear, that he will not always be the most tactically expedient, but it will be universal.
Let's try to assume, that the average firing order will be as follows:
1. 1-th store and about half of the 1st machine-gun tape (preferably with a large number of tracer) fired off automatic fire in the general direction of the enemy without written search purposes, not taking his finger off the trigger. Fires from scattering on the front and with the change of levels. At first, fire is as if in the direction of the enemy's shoulders, then as if in the direction of the feet of the enemy. can recommend, to the gun barrel at the same time as it drew the letter Z. The main objective of the change from the top down shooting levels - to avoid shooting exclusively over the heads of the enemy. This is a very common, even the "standard" error. Therefore, the change of level is taken down, so that at least part of the bullets passed on the lower level, where the most likely opponent is zalegshy.
2. Next soldiers me an empty shop on a new one with the usual (no tracer) ammunition and begins combing the place most likely location of the enemy single pair (!) aimed shots, but even at a fast pace. Gunner respectively passes on the fire in short bursts, also taking aim at likely places enemy lines. Fires from scattering on the front and in depth.
Important, to combing places are likely to remain the weapon emplacements attacking machine-gun fire made it single shots, rather than short bursts. maybe, that after the change of shops should even shout aloud "paired single". psychologically important, soldiers began to shift from impulsive action to a more deliberate. Change store and ceasefire must be a psychological signal to this. Better, that there was no temptation to switch to long queues or to conduct continuous automatic fire.
3. After emptying the machine shop and 2nd 1st shooting a machine gun belt, should switch to the shooting on the principle of "do not see - I do not shoot". The fire can be conducted as a single-shot, and short bursts. If attackers firing points still remain visible, it can be used to comb the fire most likely locations of enemy firing points, but already in the quiet pace, wherein as single shots, and short bursts.
In the future, the choice of fire, determined by the, as real events unfold.
It seems, that this sequence contains the optimal combination of factors, making it the most adapted to the average situation:
– use of the effect of dense overwhelming fire on the ambush
– limited aimless shooting "in milk" ammunition
– used tactic combing fire likely places opponent Spent
– Guide Psychology soldier in an ambush. He gradually transferred from impulsive action to deliberate.
– "Omnivorous" in relation to the type of terrain, distance and visibility of enemy positions.
It can be assumed, that is a sequence of actions should be seen as a base for training kontrzasadnym actions.
This article is not considering setting fumes, movements and wider - maneuver, and reacting the soldiers inside trapped under fire groups and reacting with the supporting units after exposure ambushed. Her goal was to have - to consider only one element kontrzasadnyh actions. certainly, This element must be organically included in other actions, undertaken by, who was ambushed.
